Practical Failure Analysis

, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp 56–61 | Cite as

Comparison of transmission and scanning electron fractography

  • J. L. Hubbard
Peer Reviewed Articles

Abstract

The transmission electron microscope, with suitable replication techniques, was used extensively during the 1950s and 1960s to study the surfaces of metal fractures, both to understand the mechanism of fracture and for practical failure analysis. When the scanning electron microscope was introduced in the 1960s, these studies were greatly simplified by the lack of necessity for replication. The appearance of the fracture surfaces, however, was different in some cases from the appearance the fractographer was accustomed to seeing from his or her negative replica. This work was done to help translate from one technique to another.

Keywords

electron fractography failure analysis fractography fracture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L’art de Convertir le Fer en Acier, Paris, 1722.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Martins:Zeitschrift des Vereins Deutscher Ingenierure, 1878,21(11).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Osmond, C. Frémont, and G. Cartaud:Revue de Metallurgie, 1904,1(10).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Portevin:Rapports du Premier Congrés International de la Sécurité Aérienne, 1930,1(3).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Portevin:Met. Prog., June 1931,87.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.A. Zapffe and C.E. Sims:Met. Technol., 1941,8, TP 1307.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.A. Zapffe and G.A. Moore:Met. Technol., 1943,10, TP 1553.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.A. Zapffe and M. Clogg:Trans. ASM, 1945,34, pp. 71, 108.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.A. Zapffe:Met. Prog., 1946,50, p. 283.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.A. Zapffe:Met. Prog., 1947,51, p. 428.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.A. Zapffe:Rev. Mét., 1947,44, p. 9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.A. Zapffe:Trans. ASM, 1949,41, p. 396.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.A. Zapffe and C.D. Worden:Trans. ASM, 1951,53, p. 958.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.A. Zapffe and F.K. Landgraf:Rev. Mét., 1951,48, p. 811.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Phillips, V. Kerlins, and B.V. Whiteson:Electron Fractography Handbook, Technical Report ML-TDR, 64–416, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, 1965.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Henry and J. Plateau:La Microfractographie, 3, Métaux, ed.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Hubbard: “A Comparison Atlas of Electron and Scanning Electron Fractography,” master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.A. Fellows: Comparison of SEM and TEM Stereofractographs, vol. 9,Metals Handbook, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1974, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International - The Materials Information Society 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Hubbard
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials Analytical ServicesSuwanee

Personalised recommendations