Comparative studies on codon usage pattern of chloroplasts and their host nuclear genes in four plant species
- 188 Downloads
A detailed comparison was made of codon usage of chloroplast genes with their host (nuclear) genes in the four angiosperm speciesOryza sativa, Zea mays, Triticum aestivum andArabidopsis thaliana. The average GC content of the entire genes, and at the three codon positions individually, was higher in nuclear than in chloroplast genes, suggesting different genomic organization and mutation pressures in nuclear and chloroplast genes. The results of Nc-plots and neutrality plots suggested that nucleotide compositional constraint had a large contribution to codon usage bias of nuclear genes inO. sativa, Z. mays, andT. aestivum, whereas natural selection was likely to be playing a large role in codon usage bias in chloroplast genomes. Correspondence analysis and chi-test showed that regardless of the genomic environment (species) of the host, the codon usage pattern of chloroplast genes differed from nuclear genes of their host species by their AU-richness. All the chloroplast genomes have predominantly A- and/or U-ending codons, whereas nuclear genomes have G-, C- or U-ending codons as their optimal codons. These findings suggest that the chloroplast genome might display particular characteristics of codon usage that are different from its host nuclear genome. However, one feature common to both chloroplast and nuclear genomes in this study was that pyrimidines were found more frequently than purines at the synonymous codon position of optimal codons.
Keywordscodon usage bioinformatics chloroplast plant genome
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bulmer M. 1988 Are codon usage patterns in unicellular organisms determined by selectionmutation balance?J. Mol. Biol. 1, 15–26.Google Scholar
- Greenacre M. J. 1984Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
- Gupta S. K., Bhattacharyya T. K. and Ghosh T. C. 2004 Synonymous codon usage inLactococcus lactis: mutational bias versus translational selection.J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 21, 1–9.Google Scholar