Skip to main content
Log in

The role of manufacturing defects in munition component failures

  • Peer Reviewed Articles
  • Published:
Practical Failure Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons and Materials Research Directorate performs numerous failure analysis investigations on munition-related components. Many of the failures are attributable to defects that can be traced back to the manufacturing process. Typical manufacturing defects encountered include those associated with the material, forging, casting, welding, and heat treatment processes. Dimensional anomalies have also been noted. Munition component failures are very costly and may seriously affect the safety and readiness of the armed forces. Additionally, repeated failure may lead to the grounding (removal from service) of a system, depending on the severity of the problem. Specific examples of component defects/failures discussed in this report include bomb fin retaining bands, general purpose bomb suspension lugs, missile launcher attachment bolts, cluster bomb tailcones, general purpose bomb fins, and Gatling gun breech bolt assemblies. This paper focuses on the importance of proper manufacturing techniques to the munitions industry and, by inference, to numerous other industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anon.: inProduct Design Guide for Forging, Forging Industry Association, Cleveland, OH, 1997, p. 148.

  2. Anon.: inASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis, ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1992, p. 398.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anon.: inProduct Desing Guide for Forging, Forging Industry Association, Cleveland, OH, 1997, pp. 6–7.

  4. Anon.: inInternational Atlas of Casting Defects, M.T. Rowley, ed., American Foundrymen’s Society, Des Plaines, IL, pp. 46–47.

  5. Anon.: inInternational Atlas of Casting Defects, M.T. Rowley, ed., American Foundrymen’s Society, Des Plaines, IL, p. 269.

  6. Anon.: inWelding Handbook, 8th ed., vol. 1, Welding Technology, L.P. Connor, ed., American Welding Society, Miami, FL, 1987, p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.F. Decker, J.T. Eash, and A.J. Goldman:18% Nickel Maraging Steel, Source Book on Maraging Steels, American Society for Metals, Materials Park, OH, 1979, p. 370.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Vishnevsky: Interim Report—Contract DAAG 46-69-C-0060, Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, February 1970, p. 34.

  9. Anon.: inCarburizing and Carbonitriding, A.G. Gray, ed., American Society for Metals, Materials Pauk, OH, 1977, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anon.: inSource Book on Maraging Steels, American Society for Metals, 1979, p. 370.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pepi, M. The role of manufacturing defects in munition component failures. Practical Failure Analysis 2, 43–49 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715391

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715391

Keywords

Navigation