Abstract
The bendability of two Al-Mg-Si heat-treatable alloys was studied and compared with the performance of a non-heat-treatable Al-Mg alloy. A semi-guided wrap-bend tester consistent with ASTM E290 was used to obtain minimum bend radii and produce consistent bend radii for analysis of fracture mechanisms. Bending failure in these alloys was based on a surface roughening, or orange peel, process where the outer surface grains separated and produced depressions on the surface of the material. These depressions acted as notches that increased local stresses and eventually caused failure. The fracture was intergranular in nature, with a jagged crack progressing through the thickness of the material. Several factors that affect the bendability of AA6xxx alloys are quantified in this study. Critical elements regarding natural aging, artificial aging, deformation, and composition are discussed.
A parameter of specific interest is the inclusion of copper in these alloys. Copper was added in an effort to increase the artificial aging response of selected alloys. This is of particular importance in the automotive industry because artificial aging occurs during the painting process, but adequate time and temperature is not provided to fully strengthen the alloys. It is believed by some automotive manufacturers that the inclusion of copper can have a negative effect on formability and bendability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.J. Chakrabti, B.K. Cheong, and D.E. Laughlin:Automotive Alloys II, S.K. Das, ed., TMS Proc., Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 27–44.
D.K. Chatterjee and K.M. Entwhistle:J. Inst. Met., 1973, vol. 101, pp. 53–59.
D. Laughlin and W.F. Miao:Met. Trans., 2000, vol. 31A, pp. 361–371.
R.J. Livak:Met. Trans., 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 1218–1221.
T. Sakaruai and T. Eto:Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Aluminum Alloys, L. Arnberg, O. Lohne, E. Nes, and N. Ryum, ed., Norwegian Institute of Technology and SINTEF Metallurgy, Trondheim, 1992, vol. 1, pp. 208–213.
M. Tamizifar and G.W. Lorimer:Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Aluminum Alloys, L. Arnberg, O. Lohne, E. Nes, and N. Ryum, ed., Norwegian Institute of Technology and SINTEF Metallurgy, Trondheim, 1992, vol. 1, pp. 220–225.
H. Livatyali, A. Muderrisoglu, M.A. Ahmetoglu, N. Akgerman, G.L. Kinzel, and T. Altan:J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 2000, vol. 98, pp. 41–52.
A. Muderrisoglu, M. Murrata, M.A. Ahmetoglu, N. Akgerman, G. Kinzel, and T. Altan:J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 1996, vol. 59, pp. 10–17.
M. Svensson:Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes—Numiform ’98, J. Huetink and F.P.T. Baaijens, ed., Enschede, Netherlands, 1998, pp. 925–931.
E.H. Atzema, R. Baartman, and A.J.H. Klomp:Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes—Numiform ’98, J. Huetink and F.P.T. Baaijens, ed., Enschede, Netherlands, 1998, pp. 933–940.
P.A. Friedman and S.G. Luckey:Aluminum 2001: Proceedings of the 2001 TMS Annual Meeting Automotive Alloys and Joining Aluminum Symposia, G. Kaufman, J. Green, and S. Das, ed., TMS Proc., Warrendale, PA, 2001, pp. 3–15.
D.G. Altenpohl:Aluminum: Technology, Applications, and Environment, 6th ed., The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1998, p. 135.
J.D. Bryant, H. Kung, and A. Misra:Automotive Alloys II, S.K. Das, ed., TMS Proc., Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 3–18.
W.F. Miao and D. Laughlin:J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 2000, vol. 19, pp. 201–203.
D.W. Pashley, J.W. Rhodes, and A. Sendorek: J. Inst. Met., 1966, vol. 94, pp. 41–49.
J. Sarkar, T.R.G. Kutty, D.S. Wilkinson, J.D. Embury, and D.J. Lloyd:Mater. Sci. Forum, 2000, vols. 331–337, pp. 583–588.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedman, P.A., Luckey, S.G. Failure of Al-Mg-Si alloys in bending. Practical Failure Analysis 2, 33–42 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715390
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715390