Practical failure analysis

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 51–62 | Cite as

Failure analysis of helical suspension springs under compressor start/stop conditions

  • M. A. Zaccone
Peer Reviewed Articles
  • 330 Downloads

Abstract

During testing of compressors under start/stop conditions, several helical suspension springs failed. The ensuing failure investigation showed that the springs failed due to fatigue. The analysis showed that during start/stop testing the springs would undergo both a lateral and axial deflection, greatly increasing the torsional tresses on the spring. To understand the fatigue limits under these test conditions, a bench test was used to establish the fatigue strength of the springs. The bench tests showed that the failed springs had an unacceptable surface texture that reduced the fatigue life. Based on an understanding of the compressor motion, a Monte Carlo model was developed based on a linear damage theory to predict the fatigue life of the springs during start/stop conditions. The results of this model were compared to actual test data. The model showed that the design was marginal even for springs with acceptable surface texture. The model was then used to predict the fatigue life requirements on the bench test such that the reliability goals for the start/stop testing would be met, thus reducing the risk in qualifying the compressor.

Keywords

fatigue springs compressor linear damage theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Carlson:Machinery’s Handbook, 26th ed., Industrial Press, New York, 2000, p. 331.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Maker: inASM Handbook, vol. 11,Failure Analysis and Prevention, 10th ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986, pp. 553–558.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Brooks and A. Choudhury:Metallurgical Failure Analysis, McGraw Hill, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM A228-93, American Society for Testing and Materials, New York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.M. Wahl:Mechanical Springs, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Shigley and L. Mitchell:Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw Hill, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.E. Burdick, F.S. Chaplin, and W.L. Sheppard:Trans. ASME, October 1939, pp. 623–632.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. E. Crede:Vibration and Shock Isolation, John Wiley, New York, 1951.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.E. Crede and J.P. Walsh:J. Appl. Mech., vol. 14(1), pp. A7–14.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Godfrey: inASM Handbook, vol. 1,Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High Performance Alloys, 10th ed., ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990, pp. 302–326.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Nelson:Accelerated Testing, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Kececioglu:Reliability & Life Testing Handbook, vol. 2, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.A. Collins:Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design, 2nd ed, John Wiley, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Nelson:J. Qual. Technol., vol. 17(3), July 1985, pp. 140–146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International - The Materials Information Society 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Zaccone
    • 1
  1. 1.GE AppliancesLouisville

Personalised recommendations