Bulletin of Materials Science

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 137–142 | Cite as

Behaviour ofE-glass fibre reinforced vinylester resin composites under impact fatigue

  • Rita Roy
  • B. K. Sarkar
  • N. R. Bose


An impact fatigue study has been made for the first time on 63.5% glass fibre reinforced vinylester resin notched composites. The study was conducted in a pendulum type repeated impact apparatus especially designed and fabricated for determining single and repeated impact strengths. A well-defined impact fatigue (S-N) behaviour, having a progressive endurance below the threshold single cycle impact fracture stress with decreasing applied stress has been demonstrated. Fractographic analysis revealed fracture by primary debonding having fibre breakage and pullout at the tensile zone, but a shear fracture of fibre bundles at the compressive zone of the specimen. The residual strength, modulus and toughness showed retention of the properties at high impact stress levels up to 1000 impacts followed by a sharp drop. Cumulative residual stresses with each number of impacts not withstanding the static fatigue failure at long endurances have been ascribed for the composite failures under the repeated impact stresses.


impact fatigue static fatigue residual stress E-glass fibre vinylester resin 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agarwal B D and Dally J W 1975J. Mater. Sci. 10 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boller K H 1957Modern Plastics 34 163Google Scholar
  3. Caprino G 1983J. Mater. Sci. 18 2269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caprino G 1984J. Compos. Mater. 18 508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charewicz A and Daniel I M 1975 inComposites materials fatigue and fracture, ASTM STP 586 p. 92Google Scholar
  6. Choi H Y, Wu H Y T and Chang F K 1991J. Compos. Mater. 25 1012Google Scholar
  7. Davies G A O, Hitchings D and Zhou G 1996Composites A27 1147Google Scholar
  8. Hashin Z and Rotem A 1973J. Compos. Mater. 7 448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu D and Malvern L E 1987J. Compos. Mater. 21 594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maity S and Sarkar B K 1995Bull. Mater. Sci. 18 857Google Scholar
  11. Novak R C and Decrecent M A 1972 inImpact behaviour of unidirectional composites, ASTM STP (Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials)497 p. 311Google Scholar
  12. Oever Van den M and Peijs T 1998Composites A29 227Google Scholar
  13. Owen M J and Bishop P T 1972J. Phys. D5 1621Google Scholar
  14. Owen M J and Bishop P T 1973J. Phys. D6 2057Google Scholar
  15. Papanicolaou G C and Stavropoulus C D 1995Composites 26 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sarkar B K 1998Bull. Mater. Sci. 21 329Google Scholar
  17. Sarkar B K and Glinn T G J 1971J. Mater. Sci. 54 601Google Scholar
  18. Sierakowski R L, Malvern L E and Takeda N 1982 inMicroscopic observations of cross-sections of impacted composite laminates, Composite technology review, ASTM STP (Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials) p. 40Google Scholar
  19. Sohn M S and Hu X Z 1995Composites 26 849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun C T and Rechak S 1988 inEffect of adhesive layers on impact damage in composite laminates, Composite materials: Testing and design, ASTM STP (Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials)972 p. 97Google Scholar
  21. Talreja R 1981Proc. R. Soc. London A378 461Google Scholar
  22. Talreja R 1985J. Comp. Tech. Res. 7 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Talreja R 1995Mater. Sci. & Eng. A200 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Roy
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. K. Sarkar
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. R. Bose
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Material ScienceIndian Association for the Cultivation of ScienceKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Central Glass and Ceramic Research InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations