Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv

, Volume 132, Issue 1, pp 116–138 | Cite as

Is European antidumping protection against Central Europe too high?

  • Hylke Vandenbussche


Is European Antidumping Protection against Central Europe Too High? —In this paper, the author finds that the average level of European antidumping protection against Central Europe in 1985-1990 was by 14 to 20 percentage points too high. Her simulation results on the Central European antidumping cases show only ‘de minimis’ injury margins. Hence, the European Commission would have dismissed all European antidumping complaints against Central European imports and no antidumping measures would have been imposed. In view of these results, the author feels that European antidumping legislation and its implementation seriously undermine the credibility of the Association Agreements recently signed between the European Union and the countries of Central Europe.

F13 F17 K2 


Ist die Antidumping-Protektion der EU gegenüber Mitteleuropa zu hoch? —Die Verfasserin stellt fest, daß der durchschnittliche AntidumpingSchutz gegenüber Mitteleuropa in den Jahren 1985–1990 um 14–20 Prozentpunkte zu hoch war. Ihre Simulationsergebnisse der mitteleuropoäischen Antidumping-Fälle weisen nur ‘de minimis’ Schadensgrenzen aus. Danach würde die Europäische Kommission alle europäischen Antidumping-Beschwerden gegenüber Importen aus Mitteleuropa abgewiesen haben, und es würden keine Antidumping-Maßnahmen ergriffen worden sein. Angesichts dieser Ergebnisse meint die Autorin, daß die europäische Antidumping-Gesetzgebung und ihre Durchführung die Glaubwürdigkeit der Assoziationsabkommen, die kürzlich zwischen der Europäischen Union und den mitteleuropäischen Ländern unterzeichnet wurden, ernsthaft untergräbt.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boltuck, R. (1987). An Economic Analysis of Dumping.Journal of World Trade Law 21:45–54.Google Scholar
  2. — (1991). Assessing the Effects on the Domestic Industry of Price-Dumping. In P. K. M. Tharakan (ed.),Policy Implications of Antidumping-Measures. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Commission of the EC (various years).Annual Report on the Community's Antidumping and Antisubsidy Activities. Brussels 1983–1993.Google Scholar
  4. Hindley, B. (1993). Helping Transitions through Trade? EC and US Policy towards Central and Eastern Europe. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)-paper.Google Scholar
  5. McGovern, E. (1990).The Anti-Dumping Report. Exeter: Globefield Press.Google Scholar
  6. Messerlin, P.A. (1989). The EC Antidumping Regulations: A First Economic Appraisal, 1980-85.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 125 (3): 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stern, B., J. Francis, and R. M. Schumacher (1976).Price Elasticities in International Trade: An Annotated Bibliography. London: Macmillan for the Trade Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar
  8. Tharakan, P. K.M. (ed.) (1991).Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  9. Tharakan, M., and J. Waelbroeck (1994). Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Decisions in the EC and in the US: An Experiment in Comparative Political Economy.European Economic Review 38 (1): 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Vandenbussche, H. (1995). How Can Japanese and Central-European Exporters to the EU Avoid Antidumping Duties?World Competition, Law and Economics Review 18 (3): 55–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hylke Vandenbussche

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations