Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multinational firms, market integration, and trade structure: What remains of the standard-goods hypothesis?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multinational Firms, Market Integration, and Trade Structure: What Remains of the Standard-Goods Hypothesis? — In extending traditional empirical trade models to multinational firms, this paper shows the effect of the transfer of firm-specific technology and intangible assets by these firms on the structure of host countries. For Belgium, a small open economy with a large presence of foreign multinationals, this effect is of crucial importance and previous studies appeared to have produced biased results by neglecting it. The econometric results show how the large multinational presence induced by the European integration has shifted Belgium’s trade structure towards differentiated products, thereby challenging the standard-goods hypothesis which states that small countries tend to specialize in nondifferentiated products. Spain and Ireland have witnessed an increase in foreign direct investment and a shift in trade structure similar to Belgium after joining the EC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-el-Rahman, K. (1991). Firms’ Competitive and National Comparative Advantages as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127 (1): 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, F. (1981). Factorproportiemodellen in de Internationale Handelstheorie. Lic. Thesis. University of Louvain, Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiti, M. (1998). Inter-Industry Trade in Manufactures: Does Country Size Matter?Journal of International Economics 44 (2): 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalization and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage.The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33: 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1986). Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Goods: A Reappraisal.Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (2): 315–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B., and M. Noland (1989). The Changing Comparative Advantage of Japan and the United States.Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 3: 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, E. (1979). Determinants of Trade and Foreign Investment: Further Evidence.Review of Economics and Statistics 61 (1): 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. (1990). Factor Market Barriers Are Trade Barriers.European Economic Review 34 (4): 831–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., H. Braconier, and R. Forslid (1999). Multinationals, Endogenous Growth and Technological Spillovers: Theory and Evidence. CEPR Discussion Paper 2155. CEPR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, F. (1998). FDI and the Structure of Employment and Industry in the EC Periphery: The Cases of Ireland and Spain. Mimeo.

  • Belderbos, R., and L. Sleuwaegen (1998). Tariff Jumping DFI and Export Substitution: Japanese Electronics Firms in Europe.International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (5): 601–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomstrom, M., and A. Kokko (1994). Home Country Effects of Foreign Investment. In S. Globerman (ed.),Canadian-Based Multinationals. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. P. (1983). On the Theoretical Interpretation of Indices of Trade Intensity and Revealed Comparative Advantage.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121 (2): 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. P., and L. Sveikauskas (1992). Judging Factor Abundance.Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 599–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. P., A. Hollander, and J. M. Viaene (1998).Applied International Trade Analysis. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, S. L. (1993). A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with a Trade-off between Proximity and Concentration. NBER Working Paper 4269. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M. (1998). Economic Geography, Industry Location and Trade.World Economy 21 (6): 775–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M., and J. Torstensson (1996). Regional Integration, Scale Economies and Industry Location in the European Union. CEPR Discussion Paper 1435. CEPR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1996).Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E., and P. J. Williamson (1985). What Is Product Differentiation, Really?Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (2): 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., and E. Helpman (1995). International R&D Spillovers.European Economic Review 39 (5): 859–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culem, C. (1984). Comparative Advantage and Industrial Restructuring — The Belgian Case 1970–1980. Working Paper. Centre d’Economie Mathématique et d’Econométrie, ULB, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., and B. Lyons (1996).Industrial Organization in the European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (1996). Does Economic Geography Matter for International Specialization? NBER Working Paper 5706. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (1998). Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment. NBER Working Paper 6787. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (1999). Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation.European Economic Review 43 (2): 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. (1960). Quelques Réflexions Sereines sur l’Adaptation de l’Industrie Belge au Marché Commun.Comptes Rendu de la Société d’ Economie Politique de Belgique 275: 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. (1961). Les Exportations intra-CEE en 1958 et la Position Belge.Recherches Economiques de Louvain 27 (8): 717–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1993).Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Reading (U. K.): Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1998). The European Internal Market Program and Inbound Foreign Direct Investment. In J. Dunning (ed.),Globalization, Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W., and J. R. Markusen (1996). Multinational Firms, Technology Diffusion and Trade.Journal of International Economics 41 (1-2): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., P. Hansson, L. Lundberg, and A. Melchior (1997).Technology and International Trade. Cheltenham (U. K.): Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, T. (1999). Economic Geography and the Department of Vertical Multinational Production.Journal of International Economics 48 (2): 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, W. H., D. Mehta, and R. Vernon (1967). The R& D Factor in International Trade and International Investment of United States Industries.Journal of Political Economy 75 (February): 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. (1997). Technology, Factor Supplies, and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model.American Economic Review 87 (4): 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1984). A Simple Theory of Trade with Multinational Corporations.Journal of Political Economy 92: 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1985). Multinational Corporations and Trade Structure.Review of Economic Studies 52: 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L. (1980). Observations on the Relation between ‘Revealed Comparative Advantage’ and Comparative Advantage as Indicated by Pre-Trade Relative Prices.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 116 (2): 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holemans, B., and L. Sleuwaegen (1988). Innovations, Expenditures and the Role of Government in Belgium.Research Policy 17 (2): 375–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, I. J., and J. R. Markusen (1992). Endogenous Market Structures in International Trade.Journal of International Economics 32 (1-2): 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, A., and A. Sapir (1988).The European Internal Market: Trade and Competition. Selected Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. (1997).Elements of Econometrics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keesing, D. (1967). The Impact of Research and Development on United States Trade.Journal of Political Economy 75: 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.American Economic Review 70 (5): 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.Journal of Political Economy 99 (31): 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., and A. J. Venables (1990). Integration and the Competitiveness of Peripheral Industry. In C. Bliss and J. Braga de Macedo (ed.),Unity with Diversity in the European Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learner, E. E. (1992). Testing Trade Theory. NBER Working Paper 3957. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F., and B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (1996). International R& D Spillovers: A Re-Examination. NBER Working Paper 5668. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S. (1961).An Essay on Trade and Transformation. New York.

  • Lipsey, R. E., and M. Y. Weiss (1981). Foreign Production and Exports in Manufacturing Industries.Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (4): 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E. and M. Y. Weiss (1984). Foreign Production and Exports of Individual Firms.Review of Economics and Statistics 66 (2): 304–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowinger, T. C. (1975). The Technology Factor and the Export Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Industries.Economic Inquiry 13 (2): 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. (1984). Multinationals, Multi-Plant Economics, and the Gains from Trade.Journal of International Economics 16 (3/4): 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. (1995). The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade.Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. (1998). Multinational Firms, Location and Trade.World Economy 21 (6): 733–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R., and A. J. Venables (1996). The Theory of Endowment, Intra-Industry and Multinational Trade. NBER Working Paper 5529. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R., and A. J. Venables (1998). Multinational Firms and the New Trade Theory.Journal of International Economics 46 (2): 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., and F. J. Velasquez (1997). The Determining Factors of Foreign Direct Investment in Spain and the Rest of the OECD: Lessons for the CEEC’s. CEPR Working Paper 1637. CEPR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., and B. Yeung (1991). Why Investors Value Multinationality.Journal of Business 64 (2): 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., and B. Yeung (1992). Internalization: An Event Study Test.Journal of International Economics 33 (1): 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M., and G. Norman (1996). Does Economic Integration Cause Foreign Direct Investment?International Economic Review 37 (4): 757–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottoviano, G. I. P., and D. Puga (1998). Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the ‘New Economic Geography’.World Economy 21: 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. (1961). International Trade and Technological Change.Oxford Economic Papers 13 (October): 232–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybaudi-Massilia, M. (2000). Economic Geography and Multinational Enterprise.Review of International Economics 81 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, L. A. (1999). Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: Agglomeration versus Specialization.European Economic Review 43 (2): 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleuwaegen, L. (1984). Location and Investment Decisions by Multinational Companies. Theoretical and Empirical Essays on the Operations of Multinational Companies in Belgium and Europe. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Louvain, Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleuwaegen, L. (1987). Multinationals, the European Community and Belgium: Recent Developments.Journal of Common Market Studies 26 (2): 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleuwaegen, L., R. Veugelers, and H. Yamawaki (1998). Comparative and Competitive Advantages: The Performance of the EC in a Global Context.Research in Global Strategic Management 66 (3): 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soete, L. (1981). A General Test of the Technological Gap Theory.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117 (4): 638–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, R. (1996). Effects of Overseas Production on Home Country Exports: Evidence Based on Swedish Multinationals.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132(2): 304–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharakan, P. K. M., and M. Vandoorne (1979). Structure of Belgium’s Comparative Advantage vis-à-vis the Developing World.Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles 82 (troisième trimestre): 213–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharakan, P. K. M., and J. Waelbroeck (1988). Has Human Capital Become a Scarce Factor in Belgium?Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles 118 (deuxième trimestre): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torstensson, J. (1998). Country Size and Comparative Advantage.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 134 (4): 590–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trefler, D. (1995). The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries.American Economic Review 85 (5): 1029–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trionfetti, F. (1998). On the Home Market Effect: Theory and Empirical Evidence. CEP Working Paper 987. London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybout, J. R. (1993). Internal Returns to Scale as a Source of Comparative Advantage: The Evidence.American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 83 (2): 440–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1997).World Investment Report. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables, A. J. (1998). The International Division of Industries: Clustering and Comparative Advantage in a Multi-Industry Model. CEPR Discussion Paper 1961. CEPR, London.

  • Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle.Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (May): 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veugelers, R., and B. Cassiman (1999). Importance of International Linkages for Local Know How Flows: Some Econometric Evidence from Belgium. CEPR Discussion Paper 2337. CEPR, London.

Download references

Authors
  1. Leo Sleuwaegen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koen De Backer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Sleuwaegen, L., De Backer, K. Multinational firms, market integration, and trade structure: What remains of the standard-goods hypothesis?. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137, 379–403 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707623

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707623

Search

Navigation