Advertisement

Review of World Economics

, Volume 137, Issue 3, pp 379–403 | Cite as

Multinational firms, market integration, and trade structure: What remains of the standard-goods hypothesis?

  • Leo Sleuwaegen
  • Koen De Backer
Articles

Abstract

Multinational Firms, Market Integration, and Trade Structure: What Remains of the Standard-Goods Hypothesis? — In extending traditional empirical trade models to multinational firms, this paper shows the effect of the transfer of firm-specific technology and intangible assets by these firms on the structure of host countries. For Belgium, a small open economy with a large presence of foreign multinationals, this effect is of crucial importance and previous studies appeared to have produced biased results by neglecting it. The econometric results show how the large multinational presence induced by the European integration has shifted Belgium’s trade structure towards differentiated products, thereby challenging the standard-goods hypothesis which states that small countries tend to specialize in nondifferentiated products. Spain and Ireland have witnessed an increase in foreign direct investment and a shift in trade structure similar to Belgium after joining the EC.

F14 F15 F23 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abd-el-Rahman, K. (1991). Firms’ Competitive and National Comparative Advantages as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127 (1): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham, F. (1981). Factorproportiemodellen in de Internationale Handelstheorie. Lic. Thesis. University of Louvain, Louvain.Google Scholar
  3. Amiti, M. (1998). Inter-Industry Trade in Manufactures: Does Country Size Matter?Journal of International Economics 44 (2): 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalization and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage.The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33: 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balassa, B. (1986). Comparative Advantage in Manufactured Goods: A Reappraisal.Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (2): 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balassa, B., and M. Noland (1989). The Changing Comparative Advantage of Japan and the United States.Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 3: 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baldwin, E. (1979). Determinants of Trade and Foreign Investment: Further Evidence.Review of Economics and Statistics 61 (1): 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin, R. (1990). Factor Market Barriers Are Trade Barriers.European Economic Review 34 (4): 831–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldwin, R., H. Braconier, and R. Forslid (1999). Multinationals, Endogenous Growth and Technological Spillovers: Theory and Evidence. CEPR Discussion Paper 2155. CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  10. Barry, F. (1998). FDI and the Structure of Employment and Industry in the EC Periphery: The Cases of Ireland and Spain. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  11. Belderbos, R., and L. Sleuwaegen (1998). Tariff Jumping DFI and Export Substitution: Japanese Electronics Firms in Europe.International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (5): 601–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blomstrom, M., and A. Kokko (1994). Home Country Effects of Foreign Investment. In S. Globerman (ed.),Canadian-Based Multinationals. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bowen, H. P. (1983). On the Theoretical Interpretation of Indices of Trade Intensity and Revealed Comparative Advantage.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 121 (2): 351–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowen, H. P., and L. Sveikauskas (1992). Judging Factor Abundance.Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 599–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowen, H. P., A. Hollander, and J. M. Viaene (1998).Applied International Trade Analysis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Brainard, S. L. (1993). A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with a Trade-off between Proximity and Concentration. NBER Working Paper 4269. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brülhart, M. (1998). Economic Geography, Industry Location and Trade.World Economy 21 (6): 775–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brülhart, M., and J. Torstensson (1996). Regional Integration, Scale Economies and Industry Location in the European Union. CEPR Discussion Paper 1435. CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  19. Caves, R. E. (1996).Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Caves, R. E., and P. J. Williamson (1985). What Is Product Differentiation, Really?Journal of Industrial Economics 34 (2): 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coe, D. T., and E. Helpman (1995). International R&D Spillovers.European Economic Review 39 (5): 859–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Culem, C. (1984). Comparative Advantage and Industrial Restructuring — The Belgian Case 1970–1980. Working Paper. Centre d’Economie Mathématique et d’Econométrie, ULB, Brussels.Google Scholar
  23. Davies, S., and B. Lyons (1996).Industrial Organization in the European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (1996). Does Economic Geography Matter for International Specialization? NBER Working Paper 5706. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (1998). Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment. NBER Working Paper 6787. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (1999). Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation.European Economic Review 43 (2): 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drèze, J. (1960). Quelques Réflexions Sereines sur l’Adaptation de l’Industrie Belge au Marché Commun.Comptes Rendu de la Société d’ Economie Politique de Belgique 275: 3–37.Google Scholar
  28. Drèze, J. (1961). Les Exportations intra-CEE en 1958 et la Position Belge.Recherches Economiques de Louvain 27 (8): 717–738.Google Scholar
  29. Dunning, J. (1993).Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Reading (U. K.): Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. Dunning, J. (1998). The European Internal Market Program and Inbound Foreign Direct Investment. In J. Dunning (ed.),Globalization, Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  31. Ethier, W., and J. R. Markusen (1996). Multinational Firms, Technology Diffusion and Trade.Journal of International Economics 41 (1-2): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fagerberg, J., P. Hansson, L. Lundberg, and A. Melchior (1997).Technology and International Trade. Cheltenham (U. K.): Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Gao, T. (1999). Economic Geography and the Department of Vertical Multinational Production.Journal of International Economics 48 (2): 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gruber, W. H., D. Mehta, and R. Vernon (1967). The R& D Factor in International Trade and International Investment of United States Industries.Journal of Political Economy 75 (February): 292–306.Google Scholar
  35. Harrigan, J. (1997). Technology, Factor Supplies, and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model.American Economic Review 87 (4): 475–494.Google Scholar
  36. Helpman, E. (1984). A Simple Theory of Trade with Multinational Corporations.Journal of Political Economy 92: 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helpman, E. (1985). Multinational Corporations and Trade Structure.Review of Economic Studies 52: 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hillman, A. L. (1980). Observations on the Relation between ‘Revealed Comparative Advantage’ and Comparative Advantage as Indicated by Pre-Trade Relative Prices.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 116 (2): 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holemans, B., and L. Sleuwaegen (1988). Innovations, Expenditures and the Role of Government in Belgium.Research Policy 17 (2): 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Horstmann, I. J., and J. R. Markusen (1992). Endogenous Market Structures in International Trade.Journal of International Economics 32 (1-2): 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jacquemin, A., and A. Sapir (1988).The European Internal Market: Trade and Competition. Selected Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kmenta, J. (1997).Elements of Econometrics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keesing, D. (1967). The Impact of Research and Development on United States Trade.Journal of Political Economy 75: 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.American Economic Review 70 (5): 950–959.Google Scholar
  45. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.Journal of Political Economy 99 (31): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krugman, P., and A. J. Venables (1990). Integration and the Competitiveness of Peripheral Industry. In C. Bliss and J. Braga de Macedo (ed.),Unity with Diversity in the European Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Learner, E. E. (1992). Testing Trade Theory. NBER Working Paper 3957. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  48. Lichtenberg, F., and B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie (1996). International R& D Spillovers: A Re-Examination. NBER Working Paper 5668. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  49. Linder, S. (1961).An Essay on Trade and Transformation. New York.Google Scholar
  50. Lipsey, R. E., and M. Y. Weiss (1981). Foreign Production and Exports in Manufacturing Industries.Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (4): 488–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lipsey, R. E. and M. Y. Weiss (1984). Foreign Production and Exports of Individual Firms.Review of Economics and Statistics 66 (2): 304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lowinger, T. C. (1975). The Technology Factor and the Export Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Industries.Economic Inquiry 13 (2): 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Markusen, J. R. (1984). Multinationals, Multi-Plant Economics, and the Gains from Trade.Journal of International Economics 16 (3/4): 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Markusen, J. R. (1995). The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade.Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Markusen, J. R. (1998). Multinational Firms, Location and Trade.World Economy 21 (6): 733–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Markusen, J. R., and A. J. Venables (1996). The Theory of Endowment, Intra-Industry and Multinational Trade. NBER Working Paper 5529. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Markusen, J. R., and A. J. Venables (1998). Multinational Firms and the New Trade Theory.Journal of International Economics 46 (2): 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Martin, C., and F. J. Velasquez (1997). The Determining Factors of Foreign Direct Investment in Spain and the Rest of the OECD: Lessons for the CEEC’s. CEPR Working Paper 1637. CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  59. Morck, R., and B. Yeung (1991). Why Investors Value Multinationality.Journal of Business 64 (2): 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morck, R., and B. Yeung (1992). Internalization: An Event Study Test.Journal of International Economics 33 (1): 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Motta, M., and G. Norman (1996). Does Economic Integration Cause Foreign Direct Investment?International Economic Review 37 (4): 757–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ottoviano, G. I. P., and D. Puga (1998). Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the ‘New Economic Geography’.World Economy 21: 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Posner, M. (1961). International Trade and Technological Change.Oxford Economic Papers 13 (October): 232–341.Google Scholar
  64. Raybaudi-Massilia, M. (2000). Economic Geography and Multinational Enterprise.Review of International Economics 81 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ricci, L. A. (1999). Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: Agglomeration versus Specialization.European Economic Review 43 (2): 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sleuwaegen, L. (1984). Location and Investment Decisions by Multinational Companies. Theoretical and Empirical Essays on the Operations of Multinational Companies in Belgium and Europe. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Louvain, Louvain.Google Scholar
  67. Sleuwaegen, L. (1987). Multinationals, the European Community and Belgium: Recent Developments.Journal of Common Market Studies 26 (2): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sleuwaegen, L., R. Veugelers, and H. Yamawaki (1998). Comparative and Competitive Advantages: The Performance of the EC in a Global Context.Research in Global Strategic Management 66 (3): 143–163.Google Scholar
  69. Soete, L. (1981). A General Test of the Technological Gap Theory.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117 (4): 638–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Svensson, R. (1996). Effects of Overseas Production on Home Country Exports: Evidence Based on Swedish Multinationals.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132(2): 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tharakan, P. K. M., and M. Vandoorne (1979). Structure of Belgium’s Comparative Advantage vis-à-vis the Developing World.Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles 82 (troisième trimestre): 213–234.Google Scholar
  72. Tharakan, P. K. M., and J. Waelbroeck (1988). Has Human Capital Become a Scarce Factor in Belgium?Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles 118 (deuxième trimestre): 3–20.Google Scholar
  73. Torstensson, J. (1998). Country Size and Comparative Advantage.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 134 (4): 590–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Trefler, D. (1995). The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries.American Economic Review 85 (5): 1029–1046.Google Scholar
  75. Trionfetti, F. (1998). On the Home Market Effect: Theory and Empirical Evidence. CEP Working Paper 987. London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
  76. Tybout, J. R. (1993). Internal Returns to Scale as a Source of Comparative Advantage: The Evidence.American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 83 (2): 440–444.Google Scholar
  77. United Nations (1997).World Investment Report. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  78. Venables, A. J. (1998). The International Division of Industries: Clustering and Comparative Advantage in a Multi-Industry Model. CEPR Discussion Paper 1961. CEPR, London.Google Scholar
  79. Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle.Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (May): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Veugelers, R., and B. Cassiman (1999). Importance of International Linkages for Local Know How Flows: Some Econometric Evidence from Belgium. CEPR Discussion Paper 2337. CEPR, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut fur Weltwirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leo Sleuwaegen
  • Koen De Backer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations