Advertisement

Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv

, Volume 138, Issue 1, pp 97–114 | Cite as

Export variety and export performance: Empirical evidence for the OECD countries

  • Michael Funke
  • Ralf Ruhwedel
Articles

Abstract

Export Variety and Export Performance: Empirical Evidence for the OECD Countries. — Does product variety matter for export performance? This has been suggested by the new trade theory. In the present paper, we investigate empirically whether increasing export variety has contributed to the export growth of the OECD countries. We calculate direct measures of export variety and estimate pooled export demand equations for 15 OECD countries. The econometric results suggest that producing highly differentiated export goods gives a competitive advantage which allows to sell more products.

F12 C23 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn, S., and P. Schmidt (1995). Efficient Estimation of Models for Dynamic Panel Data.Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altonji, J., and L. Segal (1996). Small Sample Bias in GMM Estimation of Covariance Structures.Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 14 (3): 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderton, R. (1999). Innovation, Product Quality, Variety, and Trade Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Germany and the UK.Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., and S. Bond (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.Review of Economic Studies 58(1): 29–51.Google Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., and S. Bond (1998). Dynamic Panel Data Estimation Using DPD98: A Guide for Users. Oxford University, mimeo.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, J. (1977). International Trade and Economic Growth: An Alternative to the Neoclassical Approach.Cambridge Journal of Economics 1 (2): 153–172.Google Scholar
  7. Blake, A. P., and N. Pain (1994). Investigating Structural Changes in UK Export Performance: The Role of Innovation and Direct Investment. Discussion Paper 71. National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London.Google Scholar
  8. Blundell, R., and S. Bond (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Currie, D. A., P. Levine, J. Pearlman, and M. Chui (1999). Phases of Imitation and Innovation in a North-South Endogenous Growth Model.Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 60–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixit, A., and J. Stiglitz (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Equilibrium Product Diversity.American Economic Review 67 (3): 297–308.Google Scholar
  11. Driver, R., and S. Wren-Lewis (1999). New Trade Theory and Aggregate Export Equations: An Application of Panel Cointegration. University of Exeter, Discussion Paper in Economics 99/17. Exeter.Google Scholar
  12. Erkel-Rousse, H., G. Gaulier, and M. Pajot (1999). Export Equations of a Differentiated Product.Revue d’économie politique 109 (2): 285–302.Google Scholar
  13. Feenstra, R. C. (1994). New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices.American Economic Review 84 (1): 157–177.Google Scholar
  14. Feenstra, R. C., and J. Markusen (1996). Accounting for Growth With New Inputs.International Economic Review 35 (2): 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feenstra, R. C., T.-H. Yang, T., and G. G. Hamilton (1999a). Business Groups and Product Variety in Trade: Evidence from South Korea, Taiwan and Japan.Journal of International Economics 48 (1): 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feenstra, R. C., D. Madani, T.-H. Yang, and C.-Y. Liang (1999b). Testing Endogenous Growth in South Korea and Taiwan.Journal of Development Economics 60 (2): 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flam, H., and E. Helpman (1987). Vertical Product Differentiation and North-South Trade.American Economic Review 77 (5): 810–822.Google Scholar
  18. Funke, M., and R. Ruhwedel (2001). Product Variety and Economic Growth — Empirical Evidence for the OECD Countries.IMF Staff Papers 48 (2): 225–242.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, M., and M. Kahn (1985). Income and Price Effects in Foreign Trade. In R. J. Jones and P. Kenen (ed.),Handbook of International Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  20. Greenhalgh, C. (1990). Innovation and Trade Performance in the United Kingdom.Economic Journal 100(1): 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenhalgh, C., P. Taylor, and R. Wilson (1994). Innovation and Export Volumes and Prices on a Disaggregated Study.Oxford Economic Papers 46 (1): 102–134.Google Scholar
  22. Grossman, G., and E. Helpman (1991). Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth.Review of Economic Studies 58 (1): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grubel, H. G. (1967). Intraindustry Specialization and the Pattern of Trade.Canadian Journal of Economics 33 (3): 374–388.Google Scholar
  24. Grubel, H. G., and P. J. Lloyd (1975).Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  25. Hahn, J. (1999). How Informative Is the Initial Condition in the Dynamic Panel Model with Fixed Effects?Journal of Econometrics 93 (2): 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrigan, J. (1996). Openness to Trade in Manufactures in the OECD.Journal of International Economics 40 (1/2): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helpman, E. (1981). International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale and Monopolistic Competition: A Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin Approach.Journal of International Economics 11 (3): 306–340.Google Scholar
  28. Helpman, E. (1987). Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrialized Countries.Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1 (1): 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hooker, M. A. (1996). What Happened to the Oil Price-Macroeconomy Relationship?Journal of Monetary Economics 38 (2): 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hufbauer, G. C. (1970). The Impact of National Characteristics and Technology on the Commodity Composition of Trade in Manufactured Goods. In: R. Vernon (ed.),The Technology Factor in International Trade. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hummels, D., and J. A. Levinsohn (1993). Product Differentiation as a Source of Comparative Advantage?American Economic Review 83 (2): 445–449.Google Scholar
  32. Hummels, D., and J. A. Levinsohn (1995). Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence.Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (10) 799–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kiviet, J. (1995). On Bias, Inconsistency, and Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Data Models.Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.Journal of International Economics 9 (4): 469–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krugman, P. R. (1980). Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.American Economic Review 70 (5): 950–959.Google Scholar
  36. Linder, S. B. (1961).An Essay on Trade and Transformation. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  37. Muscatelli, A., A. Stevenson, and C. Montagna (1995). Modeling Aggregate Manufactured Exports for Some Asian Newly Industrialized Economies.Review of Economics and Statistics 77 (1): 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murata, K., D. Turner, D. Rae, and L. Le Fouler (2000). Modelling Manufacturing Export Volumes Equations — A System Estimation Approach. OECD Working Paper 23. Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Norman, V. D. (1990). Assessing Trade and Welfare Effects of Trade Liberalisation: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to CGE Modelling with Imperfect Competition.European Economic Review 34: 725–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliveira-Martins, J. (1992). Export Behaviour With Differentiated Products: Exports of Korea, Taiwan and Japan to the US Domestic Market. In: M. G. Dagenais and P. A. Muet (ed.),International Trade Modelling. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Oliveira-Martins, J., and J. Toujas-Bernate (1992). Macroeconomic Import Functions with Imperfect Competition: An Application to EC Trade. In L. A. Winter (ed.),Trade Flows and Trade Policy After ‘1999’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Owen, C., and S. Wren-Lewis (1993). Variety, Quality and U. K. Exports. Discussion Paper 14. The University of Strathclyde, International Centre for Macroeconomic Modelling, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  43. Sato, K. (1976). The Ideal Log-Change Index Number.Review of Economics and Statistics 58 (2): 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schott, P. K. (2000). Do Countries Specialize? Yale School of Management, mimeo.Google Scholar
  45. Senhadji, A., and C. Montenegro (1998). Time Series Analysis of Export Demand Equations: A Cross-Country Analysis. IMF Working Paper 98/149. Washington.Google Scholar
  46. Verbeek, M. (2000).A Guide to Modern Econometrics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut fur Weltwirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Funke
  • Ralf Ruhwedel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations