Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1012–1016 | Cite as

Determination of the Nusselt versus Graetz correlation for heat transfer in channels of sinusoidal cross-section



Metallic catalytic converters are composed of monoliths through which pass hundreds or thousands of parallel channels. Their mode of manufacture is such that each channel has the cross-section of a sinusoidal curve closed off by a nearly straight edge. During the operation of such converters, heat generated at the channel walls is transferred to the gases flowing through the channels. To understand the overall heat transfer characteristics of the monolith, it is necessary to understand the heat transfer rate between the channel walls and the fluid contained within them. With the use of the computational fluid dynamics package FIDAP, a three-dimensional model of a single channel was used to determine the local Nusselt number (Nu) versus Graetz number (Gz) correlation for heat transfer between the fluid and the walls of the channel. Flow through the channel was laminar and developing from a flat velocity profile at the channel inlet to the fully developed flow towards the outlet. Three different models were developed which corresponded to sinusoid height to width aspect ratios of 5 : 2, 3 : 2, and 1:1, respectively. The Nu vs. Gz correlations for the straight edge, curved sinusoidal edge and entire perimeter were calculated and are reported.

Key words

Heat Transfer Channels Sinusoidal Cross-section Nusselt Number Graetz Number Monolith CFD Catalytic Combustion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Voecks, G. E. and Charng, T., “Modelling of Heat Transfer in Non-Adiabatic Monolith Reactors and Experimental Comparisons of Metal Monoliths with Packed Beds,”Chem. Eng Sci.,41(5), 1203 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Groppi, G. and Tronconi, E., “Theoretical Analysis of Mass and Heat Transfer in Monolith Catalysts with Triangular Channels”Chem. Eng Sci.,52(20), 3521 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hawthorn, R. D., “Afterburner Catalysts Effects of Heat and Mass Transfer between Gas and Catalyst Surface,”AIChE Symp. Sen,70(137), 428 (1974).Google Scholar
  4. Hayes, R. E. and Kolaczkowski, S. T., “Mass and Heat Transfer Effects in Catalytic Monolith Reactors,”Cat. Today,47 (1-4), 295 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Howard, C. P., “Heat-Transfer and Flow Fiction Characteristics of Skewed-Passage and Glass-Ceramic Heat Transfer Surfaces”J. Engng Pwr,87, 72(1965).Google Scholar
  6. Kolaczkowski, S. T. and Serbetcioglu, “Development of Combustion Catalysts for Monolith Reactors: A Consideration of Transport Limitations,”App. Cat. A,138,199 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kolaczkowski, S. T. and Worth, D. J., “Modelling Channel Interactions in a Non-adiabatic Multichannel Catalytic Combustion Reactof,”Cat. Today,26, 275 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shah, R K. and London, A. L., “Laminar Flow Forced Convection in Ducts,” Academic Press, New York, U.S.A. (1978).Google Scholar
  9. Sherony, D. F. and Solbrig, C. W., “Analytical Investigation of Heat or Mass Transfer and Friction Loss in a Corrugated Duct Heat or Mass Exchanger,”Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,13,145 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Votraba, J., Sinkule, J., Hlavacek, V. and Skrivanek, J., “Heat and Mass Transfer in Monolithic Honeycomb Catalysts-I,”Chem. Eng. Sci.,30,117(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zygourakis, K., “Studies on the Catalytic Reactof,” PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Institute of Chemical Engineering 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cu Phan
    • 1
  • Daniel L. Holgate
    • 1
  • Gregory J. Griffin
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations