Diffusivity of bacteria
The effects of motility and aggregation on the diffusion coefficient for bacteria were studied in an aqueous system. The effects of cell concentrations, capillary tube sizes, and dilution rates on the diffusion coefficient were examined. In general, motile cells can diffuse about 1000 times faster than non-motile cells.Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a motile cell, andKlebsiella pneumoniae, a non-motile cell, were used for this research. Diffusion coefficients were measured by the capillary tube assay developed by Adler . From this procedure the diffusion coefficient ofPseudomonas aeruginosa was 2.1×10−5 (standard deviation: 1.0× 10−5) cm2/s and that ofKlebsiella pneumoniae was 0.9×10−5 (standard deviation : 0.5 × 10−5) cm2/s. The diffusion coefficient ofPseudomonas aeruginosa was about 2.3 times higher than that ofKlebsiella pneumoniae. The Stokes-Einstein equation could not be used for estimating the diffusion coefficients forKlebsiella pneumoniae andPseudomonas aeruginosa. The experimental value for the diffusion coefficient ofKlebsiella pneumoniae was about 2000 times higher than that (4.5×10−9 cm2/s) obtained from the Stokes-Einstein equation. This discrepancy was due to the aggregation ofKlebsiella pneumoniae.
Key wordsDiffusivity Bacteria Aggregation Motile Non Motile
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adler, J.,“A Method for Measuring Chemotaxis and Use of the Method to Determine Optimum Conditions for Chemotaxis byEscherichia coif, J. of General Microbiology,74, 77 (1973).Google Scholar
- Adler, J. and Margaret, M. D., “A Method for Measuring the Motility of Bacteria and for Comparing Random and Nonrandom Motility”,J. of General Microbiology,46, 161 (1967).Google Scholar
- Adler, J. and Bonnie Templeton,“The Effect of Environmental Conditions on the Motility ofEscherichia coli”,J. of General Microbiology,46, 175 (1967).Google Scholar
- Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th ed., Williams & Wilkins Company (1974).Google Scholar
- Fahien, R.,“Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena”, McGraw-Hill Book Company (1983).Google Scholar
- Nossal, R. and Chen, S.,“Light Scattering from Motile Bacteria”,Journal de Physique,33(C1), 171 (1972).Google Scholar
- Schneider, W. R. and Doetsch, R. N.,“Effect of Viscosity on Bacterial Motility”,J. of Bacteriology,117, 696 (1974).Google Scholar
- Segel, L. A., Ilan Chet, and Yigal Henis,“A Simple Quantitative Assay for Bacterial Motility”,J. of General Microbiology,98, 329 (1977).Google Scholar
- Shoesmith, J. G., “The Measurement of Bacterial Motility”,J. of General Microbiology,22, 528 (1960).Google Scholar
- Slater, N., Powell, M. and Johnson, P., The Relevance of Bacterial Motility to Fermenter Contamination: An Experimental Study forBacillus cereus”,Trans I ChemE,59, 170 (1981).Google Scholar
- Thonemann, P. C. and Evans, C. J., “The Dispersal of an Initial Concentration of Motile Bacteria”,J. of General Microbiology,92, 25 (1976).Google Scholar
- Vaituzis, Z. and Doetsch, R. N.,“Motility Tracks: Technique for Quantitative Study of Bacterial Movement ”,Applied Microbiology,17, 584(1969).Google Scholar