Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 497–506 | Cite as

A technique for estimating maximum harvesting effort in a stochastic fishery model



Exploitation of biological resources and the harvest of population species are commonly practiced in fisheries, forestry and wild life management. Estimation of maximum harvesting effort has a great impact on the economics of fisheries and other bio-resources. The present paper deals with the problem of a bioeconomic fishery model under environmental variability. A technique for finding the maximum harvesting effort in fluctuating environment has been developed in a two-species competitive system, which shows that under realistic environmental variability the maximum harvesting effort is less than what is estimated in the deterministic model. This method also enables us to find out the safe regions in the parametric space for which the chance of extinction of the species is minimized. A real life fishery problem has been considered to obtain the inaccessible parameters of the system in a systematic way. Such studies may help resource managers to get an idea for controlling the system.


Colour noise harvested competitive system maximum harvesting parametric safe zone solution of stochastic differential equation spectral density Tchebycheff’ s inequality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvarez L H R 1998 Optimal harvesting under stochastic fluctuations and critical depensation;Math. Biosci. 152 63–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez L H R and Shepp L A 1998 Optimal harvesting of stochastically fluctuating populations;J. Math. Biol. 37 155–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya D K and Begum S 1996 Bioeconomic equilibrium of two species system 1;Math. Biosci. 135 111–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brauer F and Soudack A C 1981 Coexistence properties of some predator prey systems under constant rate harvesting and stocking;J. Math. Biol. 12 101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chattopadhyay J, Sarkar Ram Rup, Fritzsche-Hoballah Maria Elena Turlings, Ted C J and Bersier Louis-Felix 2001 Parasitoids may determine plant fitness — a mathematical model based on experimental data;J. Theor. Biol. 212 295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhuri K 1986 A bioeconomic model of harvesting a multispecies fishery;Ecol. Model. 32 267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaudhuri K 1988 Dynamic optimization of combined harvesting of a two species fishery;Ecol. Model. 32 267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark C W 1990Mathematical bioeconomics: The optimal management of renewable resources (New York: John Wiley)Google Scholar
  9. Dai G and Tang M 1998 Coexistence region and global dynamics of a harvested predator prey system;Siam. J. Appl. Math. 58 193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danilina N I, Dubrovskaya N S, Kvasha O P and Smirnov G L 1988Computational mathematics (Moskow: Mir Publishers)Google Scholar
  11. Dimentberg M F 1988 Statistical dynamics of nonlinear and time varying systems (New York: John Wiley)Google Scholar
  12. Gause G F 1935La Théorie Mathématique de la Lutte pour la Vie (Paris: Harmann)Google Scholar
  13. Hoel P G, Port S C and Stone C J 1993Introduction to stochastic process (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company)Google Scholar
  14. Horsthemke W and Lefever R 1983Noise induced transitions (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
  15. Laloe F 1988 Un modèle global avee quantité de biomasse inaccessible liée aux conditions environnemetales. Application aux données de la pêche ivoiro ghanéenne de Sardinella auritra;Aquat. Living Resour. 1 289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laloe F and Samba A 1991 A simulation model of artisanal fisheries of Senegal;ICES Mar. Sci. Symp. 193 281–286Google Scholar
  17. Laloe F, Pech N, Sabatier R and Samba A 1998 Model identification for flexible multifleet-multispecies fisheries: a simulation study;Fisheries Res. 37 193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. May RM 1973 Stability in randomly fluctuating deterministic environments;Am. Nat. 107 621–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. May R M 1975Stability and complexity in model ecosystems (Princeton: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
  20. McNamara J M, Webb J N and Collins E J 1995 Dynamic optimization in fluctuating environments;Proc. R. Soc. London B. 261 279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pella J J and Tomlinson P K 1969A generalized stock production model;Bull. IATTC 13 419–496Google Scholar
  22. Sarkar R R, Chattopadhyay J and Bairagi N 2001 Effects of environmental fluctuation in an eco-epidemiological model of Salton Sea;Environmetrics 12 289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schaefer M B 1957 A study of the dynamics of the fishery for yellowfin tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean;Bull. IATTC 2 247–285Google Scholar
  24. Uhlenbeck G E and Ornstein L S 1954 On the theory of Brownian motion; inSelected papers on noise and stochastic process (ed.) N Wax (New York: Dover)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Embryology Research UnitIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations