Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp i–iv | Cite as


Conservation biology: The new consensus
  • Sahotra Sarkar


  1. Caughley G 1994 Directions in conservation biology;J. Anim. Ecol. 63 215–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diegues A C S A 1998The myth of untamed nature in the Brazilian rainforest (SÃo Paulo: University of SÃo Paulo)Google Scholar
  3. Gadgil M and Berkes F 1991 Traditional resource management systems;Res. Manag. Optim. 8 127–141Google Scholar
  4. Guha R 1989 Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: a third world critique;Environ. Ethics 11 71–83Google Scholar
  5. Guha R (ed.) 1994Social ecology (Delhi: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  6. Guha R and Martinez-Alier J 1998Varieties of environmentalism: essays north and south (New Delhi: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  7. Haila Y and Margules C R 1996 Survey research in conservation biology;Ecography 19 323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Margules C R 1989 Introduction to some Australian developments in conservation evaluation;Biol. Conserv. 50 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Margules C R and Pressey R L 2000 Systematic conservation planning;Nature (London)405 242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Peet R and Watts M (eds) 1996Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements (London: Routledge)Google Scholar
  11. Salleh A K 1984 Deeper than deep ecology: the eco-feminist connection;Environ. Ethics 6 339–345Google Scholar
  12. Sarkar S 1998 Restoring wilderness or reclaiming forests;Terra Nova 3 35–52Google Scholar
  13. Sarkar S 2002 Defining "biodiversity": assessing biodiversity;Monist 85 131–155Google Scholar
  14. Sessions G (ed.) 1995Deep ecology for the 21st century (Boston: Shambhala)Google Scholar
  15. Soulé M E 1985 What is conservation biology;BioScience 35 727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sahotra Sarkar

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations