Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Climbing ripple structure and associated storm-lamination from a Proterozoic carbonate platform succession: Their environmental and petrogenetic significance

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Mesoproterozoic Pandikunta Limestone, a shallow water carbonate platform succession in the Pranhita-Godavari Valley, south India, displays well developed climbing ripple lamination and storm deposited structures, such as HCS, wave ripple-lamination, combined-flow ripple-lamination and low angle trough cross-stratification. Different types of stratification developed in calcisiltite with minor amounts of very fine quartz sand and silt. The climbing ripple structures exhibit a complex pattern of superposition of different types (type A, B and S) within cosets pointing to a fluctuating rate of suspension depositionversus bedform migration, and an unsteady character of the flow. Close association of climbing ripple structures, HCS with anisotropic geometry, wavy lamination and combined-flow ripple-lamination suggest that the structures were formed by storm generated combined-flow in a mid-shelf area above the storm wave base. The combined-flow that deposited the climbing ripple structures had a strong unidirectional flow component of variable magnitude. The climbing ripple structure occurs as a constituent of graded stratified beds with an ordered vertical sequence of different types of lamination, reflecting flow deceleration and increased rate of suspension deposition. It is inferred that the beds were deposited from high-density waning flows in the relatively deeper part of the ancient shelf. The structures indicate that the Pandikunta platform was subjected to open marine circulation and intense storm activities.

The storm deposited beds, intercalated with beds of lime-mudstone, consist primarily of fine sand and silt size carbonate particles that were hydrodynamically similar to quartz silt. Detrital carbonate particles are structureless and are of variable roundness. The particles were generated as primary carbonate clasts in coastal areas by mechanical disintegration of rapidly lithified beds, stromatolites or laminites, and the finest grade was transported to the offshore areas by storm-generated currents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ager D V 1974 Storm deposits in the Jurassic of the Moroccan High Atlas;Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 15 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner T 1982 Calcareous tempestites: storm dominated stratification in Upper Muschelkalk limestones (Middle Trias. SW-Germany); In:Cyclic and Event Stratification (eds) G Einsele and A Seilacher (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) 180–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner T 1985 Storm depositional systems: dynamic stratigraphy in modern and ancient shallow marine sequences; In:Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 3 (eds) G M Friedman, H J Neugebauer and A Seilacher (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen J R L 1970 A quantitative model of climbing ripples and their cross-laminated deposits;Sedimentology 14 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen J R L 1971 A theoretical and experimental study of climbing-ripple cross-lamination, with a field application to the Uppsala esker;Geografiska Annaler 53A 157–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen J R L 1973 A classification of climbing-ripple cross-lamination;J. Geol. Soc. London 129 537–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R W and Southard J B 1990 Exploratory flow-duct experiments on combined-flow bed configurations, and some implications for interpreting storm event stratification;J. Sediment. Petrol. 60 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RGC 1959 The cavernous structure of some MississippianStromatactics reefs in Lanchashire England;J. Geol. 67 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beukes N J 1996 Sole marks and combined-flow storm event beds in the Brixton Formation of the siliciclastic Archaean Witwatersrand Supergroup, South Africa;J. Sediment. Res. 66 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma A H 1962 Sedimentology of some Flysch deposits; a graphic approach to facies interpretation (Amsterdam: Elsevier) p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A K 1970a Precambrian stratigraphy and sedimentation around Ramgundam, Andhra Pradesh (unpubl. PhD thesis;Calcutta University India) p. 236.

  • Chaudhuri A K 1970b Precambrian stromatolites in the Pranhita-Godavari Valley, South India;Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 7 309–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A K 1977 Influence of eolian processes on Precambrian sandstones of the Godavari Valley, South India;Precamb. Res. 4 339–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A K 2003 Stratigraphy and palageography of the Godavari Supergroup in the south-central Pranhita-Godavari Valley South India;J. Asian Earth Sci. 21 595–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A K, Chanda S K and Dasgupta S 1994 Proterozoic glauconitic peloids from South India: their origin and significance;J. Sediment. Res. A64 765–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A K and Howard J D 1985 Ramgundam Sandstone: a middle Proterozoic shoal-bar sequence;J. Sediment. Petrol. 55 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A K, Saha D, Deb G K, Patranabis Deb S, Mukherjee M K and Ghosh G 2002 The Purana basins of southern cratonic province of India ⊕ case for Mesoproterozoic fossil rifts;Gond. Res. 5 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman M J and Gagliano S M 1965 Sedimentary structures: Mississippi river deltaic plain; In:Primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation (ed.) G V Middleton,Soc. Econ. Palaeont. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 12 133-148.

  • Dasgupta S, Chaudhuri A K and Fukuoka M 1990 Compositional characteristics of glauconitic alterations of K-feldspar from India and their implications;J. Sediment. Petrol. 60 277–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Raaf J F M, Boersma J R and Van Gelder sA 1977 Wave generated structures and sequences from a shallow marine succession. Lower Carboniferous County Cork, Ireland;Sedimentology 24 451–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dott R H Jr and Bourgeois J 1982 Hummocky stratification: significance of its variable bedding sequences;Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 93 663–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke W L 1985 Hummocky cross-stratification, tropical hurricanes, and intense winter storms;Sedimentology 32 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke W L, Arnott R W C and Cheel R J 1991 Shelf sandstones and hummocky cross-stratification: new insights on a stormy debate.Geology 19 625–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke W L and Leckie D A 1986 Origin of hummocky cross-stratification. Part 2, paleohydraulic analysis indicates formation by orbital ripples within the wave-formed flat-bed field, In: Shelf Sands and Sandstones; (eds) Knight R J and McLean J R,Canadian Soc. Pet. Geol. Mem. 11 339.

  • Folk R L 1965 Some aspects of recrystallization in ancient limestones; In: Dolomitization and Limestone Diagenesis (eds) L C Pray and R C Munay,Soc. Econ. Palaeont. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 13 14–48.

  • Handford C R 1986 Facies and bedding sequences in shelfstorm deposited carbonates-Fayetteville Shale and Pitkin Limestone (Mississippian) Arakansas.J. Sediment. Petrol. 56 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms J C, Southard J B and Walker R G 1982 Structures and sequences in clastic rocks;Calgary Soc. Econ. Palaeont. Mineral. Short Course 9 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs R 1990 Is there evidence for geostrophic currents preserved in the sedimentary record of inner to middle-shelf deposits? Disussion;J. Sediment. Petrol. 60 630–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter R 1977 Terminology of cross-stratified sedimentary layers of climbing-ripple structures;J. Sediment. Petrol. 47 697–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopling A V and Walker R G 1968 Morphology and origin of ripple-drift cross-lamination with examples from the Pleistocene of Massachusetts;J. Sediment. Petrol. 38 971–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisa R D 1981 Storm generated sedimentary structures in subtidal marine facies with examples from the middle and upper Ordovician of Southwestern Virginia;J. Sediment. Petrol. 51 823–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenen Ph H 1957 Emplacement of flysch type sand beds;Sedimentology 9 203–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee E D 1965 Experiments on ripple lamination; In: Primary sedimentary structures and their hydrodynamic interpretation (ed) G V Middleton,Soc. Econ. Palaeont. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 12 66–83.

  • McKee E D 1966 Significance of climbing ripple structure;US Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 550-D 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee E D, Crossby E J and Berryhill H L 1967 Flood deposits, Bijou Creek, Colorado, June 1965;J. Sediment. Petrol. 37 829–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midtgaard H 1996 Inner shelf to lower shoreface hummocky sandstone bodies with evidence for geostrophic-influenced combined-flow, Lower Cretaceous, West Greenland;J. Sediment. Res. 66 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrow P M, Fischer W and Goodge J W 2002 Wave-modified turbidites: combined-flow shoreline and shelf deposits, Cambrian, Antarctica;J. Sediment. Res. 72 641–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrow P M and Southard J B 1991 Combined-flow model for vertical stratification sequences in shallow marine storm-deposited beds;J. Sediment. Petrol. 61 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrow P M and Southard J B 1996 Tempestite deposition;J. Sediment. Res. 66 875–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottvedt A and Kreisa R D 1987 Model for the combined-flow origin of hummocky cross-stratification;Geology 15 257–361. Ror]eading H G and Collinson J D 1996 Clastic Coast; In:Sedimentary environments: processes, facies and stratigraphy (ed.) H G Reading, Blackwell Science 154-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reineck H E 1972 Tidal flats; In: Recognition of ancient sedimentary environments (eds) J K Rigby and W K Hamblin,Soc. Econ. Palaeont. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 17 146-159.

  • Sageman B B 1996 Lowstand tempestites: depositional model for Cretaceous skeletal limestones, western Interior basin;Geology 24 888–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southard J B, Lambie J M, Federico D C, Pile H T and Weidman C R 1990 Experiments on bed configurations in fine sands under bidirectional purely oscillatory flow, and the origin of hummocky cross-stratification;J. Sediment. Petrol. 60 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley K O 1974 Morphology and hydraulic significance of climbing ripples with superimposed micro-ripple-drift cross-lamination in lower Quaternary lake silts, Nebraska;J. Sediment. Petrol. 44 472–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov A P, Tugarinov A I, Zhjkov C, Stapnikova N, Bibikova E and Khores K 1964 Geochronology of Indian Precambrian;Int. Geol. Congr. 1964, New Delhi 553-567.

  • Walker R G 1963 Distinctive types of ripple drift crosslamination;Sedimentology 2 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Xian-tao 1982 Storm generated depositional types and associated trace fossils in lower Carboniferous shallow marine carbonates of Three Cliffs Bay and Ogmore-by-Sea, South Wales;Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 39 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokokawa M, Masuda F and Endo N 1995 Sand particle movement on migrating combined-flow ripples;J. Sediment. Res. A65 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 700 108, Kolkata, India

    Asru K Chaudhuri

Authors
  1. Asru K Chaudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaudhuri, A.K. Climbing ripple structure and associated storm-lamination from a Proterozoic carbonate platform succession: Their environmental and petrogenetic significance. J Earth Syst Sci 114, 199–209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02702945

Keywords

Search

Navigation