Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 13–24 | Cite as

Studies on glutamine synthetase. Purification of the enzyme from mung bean (Phaseolus aureus) seedlings and modulation of the enzyme-antibody reaction by the substrates

  • S. Seethalakshmi
  • N. Appaji Rao


Glutamine synthetase (L-glutamate : ammonia ligase, EC fromPhaseolus aureus (mung bean) seedlings was purified to homogeneity by ammonium sulphate fractionation, DEAE-cellulose chromatography, Sephadex G-200 gel filtration and affinity chromatography on histidine-Sepharose. The enzyme had a molecular weight of 775,000 ± 25,000. The enzyme consisted of identical subunits with an approximate subunit molecular weight of 50,000. Hyperbolic saturation curves were obtained with the substrates, glutamate, ATP and hydroxylamine.

Antibody, raised in the rabbit, against mung bean glutamine synthetase, completely inhibited the activity of the enzyme. Preincubation of the enzyme with glutamate and ATP, prior to the addition of the antibody, partially protected the enzyme against inhibition. TheK m values of this enzyme-antibody complex and the native enzyme were identical (glutamate, 2.5mM; ATP, 1 mM; hydroxylamine, 0.5 mM). The Km values of the partially inhibited enzyme (the enzyme pretreated with antibody prior to the addition of substrates) were 2-fold higher than those of the native enzyme. These results suggested that the substrate-induced conformational changes in the enzyme were responsible for the protection against inhibition of the enzyme activity by the antibody.


Mung bean glutamine synthetase antibody interactions Phaseolus aureus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Davis, B. J. (1964)Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.,121, 404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall R. J. (1951)J. Biol. Chem.,193, 265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. March, C. S., Parikh, I. and Cuatrecasas, P. (1974)Anal. Biochem.,60, 149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Michaelides, M. C., Sherman, R. and Helmreich, E. (1964)J. Biol. Chem.,239, 4171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Putnam, F. W. (1962)J. Biol. Chem. 237 717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rowe, W. B., Ronzio, R. A., Wellner, V. P. and Meister, A. (1970)Methods in Enzymol.,A17, 900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Seethalakshmi, S., Vaidyanathan, C. S. and Appaji Rao N.,(1977)Indian J. Biochem. Biophys.,14, 112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Seethalakshmi, S. (1978) inStudies on glutamine synthetase from Phaseolu saureus (mung bean) seedlings: Purification, kinetic and regulatory properties of the enzyme, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  9. Stadtman, E. R. (1973) inThe enzymes of glutamine metabolism eds S. Prusiner and E. R. Stadtman (New York: Academic Press) p 1.Google Scholar
  10. Tate, S. S. and Meister, A. 1973 inThe enzymes of glutamine metabolism eds, S. Prusiner and E. R. Stadtman (New York: Academic Press) p 95.Google Scholar
  11. Weber, K. and Osborn, M. (1969)J. Biol Chem.,244, 4406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Willstatter, R. and Kraut, H. (1923)Ber. 56, 1117 cited in Colowick, S. P. 1955Methods in Enzymol.,1, 97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Seethalakshmi
    • 1
  • N. Appaji Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryIndian Institute of ScienceBangalore

Personalised recommendations