Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tools for optimizing Cu electrodeposition: Modeling and reagent addition monitoring

  • Commentary
  • Copper Electrodeposition
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NI. Piret, “Perspectives of Hydrometallurgical Processing of CopperConcentrates: State of the Artand Future”Proc. of EMC 2001, Vol. 1 (Clausthal-Zellerfeld: GDMB, 2001), pp. 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F.van Raevels et al, U.S. patent 3,807,020 (1974).

  3. A.S. Gendron, R.R. Matthews, and W.C. Wilson, “Production of High Quality Electro-Refined and Electrowon Copper at Inco’s Copper Cliff Copper Refinery,”CIM Bulletin, 70 (484) (1977), pp. 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.W. Hoey et al., “Modern Tankhouse Design and Practices at Copper Refineries PTY Ltd.,”The Electrorefining and Winning of Copper, ed. J. Hoffmann et al.(Warrendale, PA:TMS, 1987), pp. 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anon., “Isa Process Refining,”Copper Studies, (April 1994), pp. 10–11.

  6. W.G. Davenport et al., “Electrolytic Copper Refining—1999 World Tankhouse Operating Data,”Proc. of Copper 99—Cobre 99, Vol. III, ed. J. E. Dutrizac et al. (Warrendale, PA:TMS, 1999), pp. 3–76.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Jenkins et al., “Electrolytic Copper-Leach, Solvent Extraction and Electrowinning World Operating Data,”Proc. of Copper 99—Cobre 99, Vol. IV, ed. R.R Hackl et al. (Warrendale, PA:TMS, 1999), pp. 493–506.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Landau and H. Traulsen, “Die neue Kupferelek-trolyse der Norddeutschen Affinerie”Erzmetall, 43 (1990), pp. 357–361.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Winand et al., “Industrial Electrodeposition of Copper, Problems Connected to the Behaviour of Organic Additions,”Application of Polarization Measurements in the Control of Metal Deposition, ed. I.H. Warren (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984), pp. 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sun and T.J. O’Keefe, “The Effect of Additives in the Nucleation and Growth of Copper onto Stainless Steel Cathodes,”Metall. Trans. B, 23B (October 1992), pp. 591–599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. R Stantke, “Utilization of CollaMat for Measuring Glue in the Copper Electrolyte,” in this issue.

  12. I.H. Warren, N. Tarn, and F. Nok, “Application of Polarization Measurements in the Electrowinning of Zinc and Copper,” R.Schumann Int. Symp.on Innovative Technology and Reactor Design in Extraction Metallurgy (Warrendale, PA:TMS, 1986), pp. 741–751.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Winand, M. Degrez, and V Bastin, “Copper Electrocrystallization and the Continuous Monitoring of Electrorefining Additives,”Proc. of Copper ’91, Vol. Ill, (Montreal: CIM, 1991), pp. 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.E. Langner and R Stantke, “The Use of the CollaMat-System for Measuring Glue Activity in Copper Electrolyte in the Laboratory and in the Production Plant,”EPD Congress 1995, ed. G.W. Warren (Warrendale, PA:TMS, 1995), pp. 559–569.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.E. Hoffmann, “Application of the Haring Cell for Glue Addition Monitoring,” in this issue.

  16. M. Goffman and T.L. Jordan, U.S. patent 4,511,443 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Ramachandran and V.L. Wildman, “Current Operations at the Amarillo Copper Refinery,”The Electrorefining and Winning of Copper, ed. J.E. Hoffmann et al. (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1987), pp. 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Wöbking and A. Anzinger, “Process Control Criteria and Methods in Electrolytic Copper Refining,”Proc. of EMC 2001,Vol. 1 (Clausthal-Zellerfeld: GDMB, 2001), pp. 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Wöbking and J. Wallner, “Neue Erkenntnisse über die (mögliche) Wirkungsweise von Thioharnstoff in der Kupferraffinationselektrolyse” (Preprint of a paper presented at the 6th Non-ferrous Metallurgical Symposium, OMBKE, Balatonaliga, Hungary, 11–13 October 1989).

  20. C. Feneau and R. Breckpot, “Problèmes Relatifs à l’Electrocristallisation du Cuivre” (Brussels, Belgium: Comm. Congrès Intern. Chim. Industr., 1966), pp. 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Breckpot, “La Précipitation électrochimique du Cuivre—Electroraffinage et Electroobtention,”ATB Metallurgie, XI (1) (1971), pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Filzwieser, K. Hein, and G. Mori, “Limiting Current Density and Diffusion Boundary Layer Calculations Using the CFD Method,” in this issue.

  23. M. Stelter, H. Bombach, and N. Nesterov, “Investigations into the Use of Polyethylene Glycols as Alternative Inhibitors in Copper Electrorefining,” in this issue.

  24. Y. K. Lee and T.J. O’Keefe, “Evaluation and Monitoring of the Nucleation and Growth of Copper Foil,” in this issue.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Copper, Nickel, Cobalt Committee of the TMS Extraction and Processing Division, JOM, USA

    Norbert L. Piret (Principal of Piret and Stolberg Partners and Advisor)

Authors
  1. Norbert L. Piret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piret, N.L. Tools for optimizing Cu electrodeposition: Modeling and reagent addition monitoring. JOM 54, 17–18 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701650

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701650

Keywords

Search

Navigation