Advertisement

Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 96–107 | Cite as

Error analysis of burning-rate measurement procedures

  • R. O. Hessler
  • R. L. Glick
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Burning-rate measurement procedures are contrasted, using a round-robin dataset of simulated motor data having either instantaneous or noninstantaneous burnout as the principal variable. Bias error components of two historical procedures are specifically identified and measured. An iterative least-squares group analysis is shown to improve results from the historical procedures by eliminating the effect of nonneutral pressure-time histories. A two-point measurement procedure is shown to produce bias-free results for these simulations.

Keywords

Burning Rate Burning Time Rocket Motor Mass Storage Rate Definition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. S. Fry, “Private communication, NATO working group burning-rate measurement analysis,” JHU/CPIA, NATO RTA WG27, Burning Rate Measurement, October 22 (1998).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Simulated motor data: Group 1 concentric bore, group 2 offset bore,” Note to NATO RTA WG27, Burning Rate Measurement, October (1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “A ballistic prediction for burning-rate motors with non-instantaneous burnout,”ibid. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. O. Hessler, “Minimizing the snowflake effect in burning-rate measurement,” in: Burning Rate Measurement Workshop, JANNAF Combustion Meeting, NASA Marshall Center, October (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Comparisons of burning-rate calculation methods,” in: JANNAF Combustion Meeting, West Palm Beach, October (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Brimhall, Circa 1980, in: W. T. Brooks,Workshop Report: Burn Rate Determination Methodology, CPIA Publication 347, Vol. II, October (1981), pp. 183–191. (Brimhall’s method was included, dating the definition as about 1980.)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Rivkin, “Rocket motor end-of burn analysis,” in: JANNAF Combustion Meeting (1990).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Behavior of pressure derivatives during burnout of simulated rocket motors,” in: JANNAF Combustion Meeting, West Palm Beach, October (1997).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. O. Hessler, “An analysis of burning-rate round-robin data,”ibid.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Consistent definitions for burning-rate measurement in solid propellant motors,” in:Int. Workshop on Measurement of Thermophysical and Ballistic Properties of Energetic Materials, Milan, June (1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. T. Brooks, “A method for more reproducible burning-rate determination,”J. Spacecraft Rockets,7, No. 12 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. K. Whitney, T. F. Owens, J. Paskind, and M. B. Rubin, “Scout motor performance and prediction study (PAPS),” NASA-CR-336, NASA Langley Research Center, December (1965).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. H. Brock, “Average burn rate, average pressure relationships in solid rockets,”J. Spacecraft Rockets,3, 1802–1803 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. L. Glick, “Reduction of solid rocket data when pressure-time history is non-neutral,”J. Spacecraft Rockets,12, No. 6 (1975), pp. 383–384.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. O. Hessler
    • 1
  • R. L. Glick
    • 2
  1. 1.SomervilleUSA
  2. 2.RensselaerUSA

Personalised recommendations