Skip to main content
Log in

Error analysis of burning-rate measurement procedures

  • Published:
Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves Aims and scope

Abstract

Burning-rate measurement procedures are contrasted, using a round-robin dataset of simulated motor data having either instantaneous or noninstantaneous burnout as the principal variable. Bias error components of two historical procedures are specifically identified and measured. An iterative least-squares group analysis is shown to improve results from the historical procedures by eliminating the effect of nonneutral pressure-time histories. A two-point measurement procedure is shown to produce bias-free results for these simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. S. Fry, “Private communication, NATO working group burning-rate measurement analysis,” JHU/CPIA, NATO RTA WG27, Burning Rate Measurement, October 22 (1998).

  2. R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Simulated motor data: Group 1 concentric bore, group 2 offset bore,” Note to NATO RTA WG27, Burning Rate Measurement, October (1998).

  3. R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “A ballistic prediction for burning-rate motors with non-instantaneous burnout,”ibid.

  4. R. O. Hessler, “Minimizing the snowflake effect in burning-rate measurement,” in: Burning Rate Measurement Workshop, JANNAF Combustion Meeting, NASA Marshall Center, October (1995).

  5. R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Comparisons of burning-rate calculation methods,” in: JANNAF Combustion Meeting, West Palm Beach, October (1997).

  6. K. Brimhall, Circa 1980, in: W. T. Brooks,Workshop Report: Burn Rate Determination Methodology, CPIA Publication 347, Vol. II, October (1981), pp. 183–191. (Brimhall’s method was included, dating the definition as about 1980.)

  7. S. Rivkin, “Rocket motor end-of burn analysis,” in: JANNAF Combustion Meeting (1990).

  8. R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Behavior of pressure derivatives during burnout of simulated rocket motors,” in: JANNAF Combustion Meeting, West Palm Beach, October (1997).

  9. R. O. Hessler, “An analysis of burning-rate round-robin data,”ibid.

  10. R. O. Hessler and R. L. Glick, “Consistent definitions for burning-rate measurement in solid propellant motors,” in:Int. Workshop on Measurement of Thermophysical and Ballistic Properties of Energetic Materials, Milan, June (1998).

  11. W. T. Brooks, “A method for more reproducible burning-rate determination,”J. Spacecraft Rockets,7, No. 12 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. K. Whitney, T. F. Owens, J. Paskind, and M. B. Rubin, “Scout motor performance and prediction study (PAPS),” NASA-CR-336, NASA Langley Research Center, December (1965).

  13. F. H. Brock, “Average burn rate, average pressure relationships in solid rockets,”J. Spacecraft Rockets,3, 1802–1803 (1966).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. Glick, “Reduction of solid rocket data when pressure-time history is non-neutral,”J. Spacecraft Rockets,12, No. 6 (1975), pp. 383–384.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated fromFizika Goreniya i Vzryva, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 107–118, January–February, 2000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hessler, R.O., Glick, R.L. Error analysis of burning-rate measurement procedures. Combust Explos Shock Waves 36, 96–107 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701518

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02701518

Keywords

Navigation