Abstract
A failure analysis of fractured deep-drawn 1050 aluminum (Al) circles revealed that the tensile strength and especially the tensile elongation of the stock material were out of specifications, leading to fracture during the drawing process. The cracks appeared on the walls of the drawn components, which are produced from 0.40 mm thick 1050 Al circles. The circle stock originated from an unknown supplier. The microstructural characterization of the circle stock indicated a coarse grain structure (180 to 220 µm), and observations of the failure areas revealed the presence of pronounced “orange peel.” Comparison was made with a raw material that originated from a registered and certified supplier in order to demonstrate the differences between the raw materials of the defective and sound products.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
EN 851:1996: “Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys—Circle and Circle Stock for the Production of Culinary Utensils—Specifications,” European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
EN 573-2:2003: “Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys—Chemical Composition and Form of Wrought Products—Chemical Composition,” European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
W.F. Hosford and R.M. Caddell: Metal Forming: Mechanics and Metallurgy, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
EN 1669:1996: “Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys—Test Methods—Earing Test for Sheet and Strip,” European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
EN 10002-1:2001: “Metallic Materials—Tensile Testing—Part 1: Method of Test at Ambient Temperature,” European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
EN 485-2:1995: “Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys—Sheet, Strip, and Plate—Part 2: Mechanical Properties,” European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pantazopoulos, G., Sampani, A. Failure analysis of fractured deep-drawn 1050 aluminum circles. JFAP 6, 24–28 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692324
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692324