Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing dimensions of a small category

  • Published:
Siberian Mathematical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. A. A. Khusainov, “The Hochschild-Mitchell dimension of linearly ordered sets and the continuum hypothesis,” Sibirsk. Mat. Zh.,35, No. 5, 1171–1184 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Mitchell, “Rings with several objects,” Adv. Math.,8, 1–161 (1972).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. H. J. Baues and G. Wirsching, “Cohomology of small categories,” J. Pure Appl. Algebra,38, No. 2/3, 187–211 (1985).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. S. MacLane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Springer, New York etc. (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Gabriel and M. Zisman, Calculus of Fractions and Homotopy Theory [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1971).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S. MacLane, Homology [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1966).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. A. Khusainov, “Cohomology of small categories with coefficients in an abelian category with exact products,” Sibirsk. Mat. Zh.,30, No. 4, 210–215 (1989).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Oliver, Higher Limits of Functor on Categories of Elementary Abelianp-Groups Aarhus, 1992. 13 p. (Preprint/Mat. Aarhus Univ.; N 6).

  9. J.-E. Roos, “Sur les foncteurs derives de lim. Applications,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. Sér. I Math. 1961. T. 252, N 24. p. 3702–3704.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. M. Latch, “The uniqueness of homology for the category of small categories,” J. Pure Appl. Algebra,9, No. 2, 221–237 (1977).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. Khusainov, “The Hochschild-Mitchell dimension of the set of reals is equal to 3,” Sibirsk. Mat. Zh.,34, No. 4, 217–227 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Mitchell, “On the dimension of objects and categories. I. Monoids,” J. Algebra,9, No. 3, 314–340 (1968).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. B. V. Novikov, “On partial cohomologies of semigroups,” Semigroup Forum,28, No. 1-3, 355–364 (1984).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Mitchell, “A remark on projectives in functor categories,” J. Algebra,69, No. 1, 24–31 (1981).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. R. Stallings, “On torsion-free groups with infinitely many ends,” Ann. of Math. (2),88, 312–334 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. G. Swan, “Groups of cohomological dimension one,” J. Algebra,12, No. 3, 585–601 (1969).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. C. C. Cheng and R. Wong, “Hereditary monoid rings,” Amer. J. Math.,104, No. 5, 935–942 (1982).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. A. A. Khusainov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research was supported by the Grant Center for Research in Mathematics at Novosibirsk State University.

Komsomol'sk-na-Amure. Translated fromSibirskiî Matematicheskiî Zhurnal, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1413–1426, November–December, 1997.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khusainov, A.A. Comparing dimensions of a small category. Sib Math J 38, 1230–1240 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02675950

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02675950

Keywords

Search

Navigation