Siberian Mathematical Journal

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 884–893 | Cite as

On quasielliptic operators inR n

  • G. V. Demidenko


Integral Operator Continuous Linear Operator Weighted Sobolev Space Parabolic Operator High Order Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. R. Volevich, “Local properties of solutions to quasielliptic systems,” Mat. Sb.,59, No. 3, 3–52 (1962).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. V. Demidenko, “Integral operators determined by quasielliptic equations. I,” Sibirsk. Mat. Zh.34, No. 6, 52–67 (1993).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. V. Demidenko, “On weighted Sobolev spaces and integral operators determined by quasielliptic equations,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk,334, No. 4, 420–423 (1994).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. D. Kudryavtsev, “Embedding theorems for classes of functions determined in the whole space or in the half-space,” I: Mat. Sb.,69, No. 4, 616–639 (1966); II: Mat. Sb.,70, No. 1, 3–35 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. D. Kudryavtsev and S. M. Nikol'skiî, “Spaces of differentiable functions in several variables and embedding theorems,” in: Contemporary Problems of Mathematics. Fundamental Trends [in Russian], VINITI, Moscow, 1988,26, pp. 5–157. (Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki.)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Nirenberg and H. F. Walker, “The null spaces of elliptic partial differential operators inR n,” J. Math. Anal. Appl.,42, No. 2, 271–301 (1973).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Cantor, “Elliptic operators and decomposition of tensor fields,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,5, No. 3, 235–262 (1981).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Choquet-Bruhat and D. Christodoulou, “Elliptic systems inH s, σ spaces on manifolds which are Euclidean at infinity,” Acta Math.,146, No. 1–2, 129–150 (1981).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. B. Lockhart, and R. C. McOwen, “Elliptic differential operators on noncompact manifolds,” Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci.,12, No. 3, 409–447 (1985).zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. V. Demidenko, “On properties of quasielliptic operators,” in: The Second Siberian Congress on Applied and Industrial Mathematics, Inst. Mat. (Novosibirsk), Novosibirsk, 1996, p. 92.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. V. Uspenskii, “On representation of functions determined by a certain class of hypoelliptic operators,” Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov.,117, 292–299 (1972).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. V. Uspenskiî, “On differential properties at infinity of solutions to a certain class of pseudod-ifferential equations,” I: Sibirsk. Mat. Zh.,13, No. 3, 665–678 (1972); II: Sibirsk. Mat. Zh.13, No. 4, 903–909 (1972).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. I. Lizorkin, “Generalized Liouville differentiation and the multiplier method in the theory of embeddings of classes of differentiable functions and its applications,” Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov.,105, 89–167 (1969).zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. H. Hardy, D. E. Littlewood, and G. Pólya, Inequalities [Russian translation], Izdat. Inostr. Lit., Moscow (1948).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. V. Uspenskiî, G. V. Demidenko, and V. G. Perepëlkin, Embedding Theorems and Applications to Differential Equations [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1984).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. V. Demidenko, “L p-theory of boundary value problems for Sobolev type equations,” in: Partial Differential Equations, Banach Center Publications, Warszawa, 1992,27, Part I, pp. 101–109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. V. Demidenko

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations