Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacology, relative bioavailability, and toxicity of three different oral cyclophosphamide preparations in a randomized, cross-over study

  • Bioavailability Study
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Thirty-six patients were entered on this study to determine the pharmacology, bioavailability, and toxicity of three different oral formulations of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan®, Endoxan®, and an investigational direct compression tablet). Patients were randomized with respect to the order in which they received the different oral cyclophosphamide preparations, and received each one for two weeks followed by a two week washout period. Concurrent chemotherapy was allowed provided it remained constant across all 3 courses of cyclophosphamide. Plasma concentrations of cyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard were measured by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. Peak plasma cyclophosphamide concentrations and times to peak plasma cyclophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard preparations were significantly greater for Endoxan® than for Cytoxan® and the investigational direct compression tablet. Drug area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), bioavailability, and plasma elimination half-life could not be reliably calculated for Endoxan® but were similar for Cytoxan® and the investigational formulation. Based on AUC comparisons, bioavailability of parent compound (relative to an oral cyclophosphamide solution) was 85% for Cytoxan® and 69% for the investigational formulation. This difference was not significant. There were no significant differences between the 3 formulations with respect to any individual type of toxicity, although the investigational formulation tended to be associated with somewhat less overall toxicity (p=0.08).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw IC, Earl LK, Mruzek MN, Harper PG, McLean AEM, Souhami RL: Differences in bioavailability between two preparations of cyclophosphamide. Lancet i: 709 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holdiness MR, Morgan LR Jr: Electron-Capture-Gas Chromatographic Analysis of I ifosfamide in Human Plasma and Urine. J of Chromatogr 275 (2):432–435, 1983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stewart DJ, Nundy D, Maroun JA, Tetreault L, Prior J: Bioavailability pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of an oral preparation of etoposide (VP-16-213, NSC 141540). Cancer Treat Rep 69:269–273 1985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart DJ, Grewaal D, Green RM, Verma S, Maroun JA, Redmond D, Robillard L, Gupta S: Bioavailability and pharmacology of oral idarubicin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27:308–314 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grochow LB, Colvin M: Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide. Clin Pharmacokinet 4(5):380–394, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Struck RF, Alberts DS, Horne K, Philips JG, Peng YM, Roe DJ: Plasma pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and its cytotoxic metabolites after intravenous versus oral administration in a randomized, crossover trial. Cancer Res 47:2723–2726 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkinson PM, O’Neill VA, Thatcher N, Lucas SB: Pharmacokinetics of high-dose cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 11:196–199 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, D.J., Morgan, L.R., Verma, S. et al. Pharmacology, relative bioavailability, and toxicity of three different oral cyclophosphamide preparations in a randomized, cross-over study. Invest New Drugs 13, 99–107 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614228

Key words

Navigation