Abstract
Objective: To investigate the appropriateness of hospitalization as the time to elicit patients’ medical care preferences, the authors evaluated the capability of seriously ill patients to participate in decision making early in hospitalization and their decision making capacity two weeks before hospital entry.
Design: Cross-sectional study with retrospective evaluation of preadmission decision making capacity.
Setting: Five acute care teaching hospitals.
Patients: Four thousand three hundred one acutely ill hospitalized adults meeting predetermined severity of illness criteria in nine specific disease categories.
Measurements: Surrogate decision makers’ estimates of the prior mental capacities of patients unable to be interviewed early in hospitalization about care preferences due to intubation, coma, or cognitive impairment. Comparison of the demographics, degrees of sickness at admission, and outcomes of interviewable vs noninterviewable patients.
Main results: Forty percent of the patients were not interviewable concerning preferences. Of these, 83% could have participated in treatment decisions two weeks prior to hospitalization. The patients who were not interviewable were more acutely ill, had less chronic disease, and were more likely to die during hospitalization than the interviewable patients.
Conclusions: Many acutely ill patients likely to die in the hospital lost their ability to make medical care decisions around the time of hospital admission. Preferences for care and advance directives should be discussed in the outpatient setting or very early in hospital admission.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-508) and 57, Federal Register 8194-8204 (March 1992).
La Puma J, Orentlicher D, Moss RJ. Advance directives on admission: clinical implications and analysis of the Patients Self-Determination Act of 1990. JAMA. 1991;266:402–5.
White MI, Fletcher JC. The Patient Self-Determination Act: on balance more help than hindrance [editorial]. JAMA. 1991;266:410–2.
Singer PA, Siegler M. Advancing the cause of advance directives. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:22–4.
Murphy DJ, Cluff LE (eds). SUPPORT: Study of Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments study design. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(suppl):1S–108S.
Phillips RS, Goldman L, Bergner M. Patient characteristics in SUPPORT: activity status and cognitive function. In: Murphy DJ, Cluff LE (eds). SUPPORT: Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments study design. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(suppl):33S-36S.
Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Chest. 1991;100:1619–36.
Bedell SE, Pelle D, Maher PL, Cleary PD. Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. JAMA. 1986;256:233–7.
Uhlmann RF, McDonald WJ, Inui TS. Epidemiology of no-code orders in an academic hospital. West J Med. 1984;140:1114–6.
Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LE, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:309–15.
Gleeson K, Wise S. The do-not-resuscitate order: still too little too late. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1057–60.
Hardin SB, Welch HG, Fisher ES. Should advance directives be obtained in the hospital? A review of patient competence during hospitalization prior to death. Clin Res. 1991;39:626A.
Finucane TE, Shumway JM, Powers RL, D’Alessandri RM. Planning with elderly outpatients for contingencies of severe illness: a survey and clinical trial. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:322–5.
Henderson M. Beyond the living will. Gerontologist. 1990;30:480–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Additional information
Funding for SUPPORT is provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wenger, N.S., Oye, R.K., Bellamy, P.E. et al. Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization. J Gen Intern Med 9, 539–543 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599276
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599276