Skip to main content
Log in

A critical analysis of Helmholtz's argument against Weber's electrodynamics

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present Helmholtz's argument against Weber's electrodynamics. It is related with a fixed charged nonconducting spherical shell and a charged particle moving inside it. Then we utilize Weber's electrodynamics plus Schrödinger's expression for gravitational interactions in order to obtain the equation of motion and to study this situation. We show that this approach avoids the problems pointed out by Helmholtz. Moreover, it indicates that the effective inertial mass of the charged particle will depend not only on the electrostatic potential of the shell but also on its velocity. This is a relevant aspect of Weber's theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. K. T. Assis, “On Mach's principle”,Found. Phys. Lett. 2, 301–318 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. K. T. Assis,Weber's Electrodynamics (Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. P. Wesley, “Weber electrodynamics, Part I. General theory, steady current effects”,Found. Phys. Lett. 3, 443–469 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Wesley, “Weber electrodynamics, Part II. Unipolar induction, Z-antenna”,Found. Phys. Lett. 3, 471–490 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. P. Wesley “Weber electrodynamics, Part III. Mechanics, gravitation”,Found. Phys. Lett. 3, 581–605 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. P. WesleySelected Topics in Advanced Fundamental Physics (Benjamin Wesley, Blumberg, Germany, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. E. Phipps, Jr., “Toward modernization of Weber's force law”,Phys. Essays 3, 414–420 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. E. Phipps, Jr., “Weber-type laws of action-at-a-distance in modern physics”,Apeiron 8, 8–14 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. E. Phipps, Jr., “Derivation of a modernized Weber force law”,Phys. Essays 5, 425–428 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. von Helmholtz, “On the theory of electrodynamics”,Philos. Mag. 44, 530–537 (1872).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Schrödinger, “Die Erfüllbarkeit der Relativitätsforderung in der klassischen Mechanik”,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 77, 325–336 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Schrödinger, “The possibility of fulfillment of the relativity requirement in classical mechanics”, in J. B. Barbour and H. Pfister, eds.,Mach's Principle—From Newton's Bucket to Quantum Gravity (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1995), pp. 147–158 [translated by J. B. Barbour].

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Maxwell,A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. (Dover, New York, 1954).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Goldstein,Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caluzi, J.J., Assis, A.K.T. A critical analysis of Helmholtz's argument against Weber's electrodynamics. Found Phys 27, 1445–1452 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551521

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551521

Keywords

Navigation