Skip to main content
Log in

Proof of Kolmogorovian censorship

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many argued (Accardi and Fedullo, Pitowsky) that Kolmogorov's axioms of classical probability theory are incompatible with quantum probabilities, and that this is the reason for the violation of Bell's inequalities. Szabó showed that, in fact, these inequalities are not violated by the experimentally observed frequencies if we consider the real, “effective” frequencies. We prove in this work a theorem which generalizes this results: “effective” frequencies associated to quantum events always admit a Kolmogorovian representation, when these events are collected through different experimental setups, the choice of which obeys a classical distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Accardi and A. Fedullo, “On the statistical meaning of the complex numbers in quantum mechanics,”Nuovo Cimento 34, 161 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Aspect, P. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell's theorem,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Bell, “On the EPR paradox,”Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, “Experimental consequences of objective local theories,”Phys. Rev. D. 10, 526 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Durt, “Three Interpretations of the violation of Bell's inequalities,”Found. Phys. 27(3), 415 (1995).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Durt, “From quantum to classical, a toy model.,” Doctoral thesis, V.U.B., January 1996 (1996a).

  7. T. Durt, “Why God might play dice,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 2271 (1996b).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Kochen and E. Specker, “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,”J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Pitowsky,Quantum Probability. Quantum Logic (Lecture Notes in Physics321) (Springer, Berlin, 1989).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. L. E. Szabó, “Quantum mechanics in an entirely deterministic universe,”Int. J. Theor. Phys. 34, 1751–1766 (1995a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. E. Szabo, “Is quantum mechanics compatible with a deterministic universe? Two interpretations of quantum probabilities,”Found. Phys. Lett. 8, 421–440 (1995b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bana, G., Durt, T. Proof of Kolmogorovian censorship. Found Phys 27, 1355–1373 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551517

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551517

Keywords

Navigation