Abstract
Old and recent ideas concerning the nature of time are reviewed, starting from Mach's refusal of Newton's absolute time. Many experiments show that the slowing down of moving clocks is a real phenomenon. Such must then also be the so-called “twin paradox,” which owes its name to its evident incompatibility with the philosophy of relativism (not to be confused with the theory of relativity). The Lorentz reformulation of special relativity started by postulating physical effects of the ether, but accepted Einstein's clock synchronization. Only because of this Lorentz could not understand the advantages of an easily deducible different theory. As stressed by Popper, one of the main problems of the usual approach is the introduction of a superdeterministic universe. Recent results obtained by the author show that a theory is possible, based on relative time but on absolute simultaneity, in which the conceptual difficulties of relativity are avoided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Isaac Newton,Sir Isaac Newton's “Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy” and his “System of the World,” translation by Andrew Motte, revised with an Appendix by Florian Caiori, 2 vols. (University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1966),I, 6.
See Ref. —, I. The quoted statement is inII, 545.
E. Mach,Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt, 4th edn. (Brockhaus, Leipzig, 1901).
A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. 49, 769 (1916).
See, e.g., G. Mana and G. Zosi,Riv. Nuovo Cimento 18, 1 (1995).
A. A. Michelson and E. W. Morley,Am. J. Sci. 34, 333 (1887).
Fitzgerald's hypothesis was reported by O. Lodge,London Trans.,A184, 727 (1893).
H. A. Lorentz,Amst. Verh. Akad. 1, 74 (1892).
H. A. Lorentz,Versuch einer Theoric der elektrischen und optischen Erscheinungen (Brill, London, 1895).
W. Voigt,Nachr. K.G.W. Göttingen 2, 41 (1887).
J. Larmor,Aether and matter (University Press, Cambridge, 1900).
R. J. Kennedy and F. M. Thorndike,Phys. Rev. 42, 400 (1932).
H. E. Ives and G. R. Stillwell,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 28, 215 (1938);31, 369 (1941).
J. Bailey, K. Borer, F. Combley, H. Drumm, F. Krienen, F. Lange, E. Picasso, W. von Ruden, F. J. M. Farley, J. H. Field, W. Flegel, and P. M. Hettersley,Nature 268, 301 (1977).
J. C. Hafele and R. E. Keating,Science 177, 166 (1972).
G. Builder,Austr. J. Phys. 11, 279 (1958);11, 457 (1958).
H. Dingle,Nature 179, 866 and 1242 (1957);Introduction, in: Henri Bergson,Duration and Simultaneity (The Library of Liberal Arts, Indianapolis, 1965), pp. xv–xlii.
M. Klein,Paul Ehrenfest (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970), p. 315.
H. Poincaré,J. Phys. Théor. Appl., 5e série,2, 347 (1912).
H. A. Lorentz,The Theory of Electrons and Its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat (Columbia University Press, New York, 1909; Dover, New York, 1952). The quoted sentence is on pp. 229–230 of the Dover reprint.
W. Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy (Harper, New York, 1962), p. 114.
A. Einstein,The Meaning of Relativity, 6th ed. (1922; rep. ed.: Chapman and Hall, London, 1967), p. 2.
L. Kostro, “An outline of the history of Einstein's relativistic ether concept,” inStudies in the History of General Relativity, J. Eisenstaedt and A. J. Kox, eds., (Birkhäuser, Berlin-Basel-Boston),3, 260 (1992).
G. Holton, “On the origins of the special theory of relativity,” in G. Holton,Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1973), p. 171.
A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. 17, 891 (1905).
A. Einstein,Relativity, The Special, The General Theory (Chicago, 1951). The quoted sentence is on p. 18.
H. Poincaré,Rev. Metaphys. Morale 6, 1 (1898).
F. Selleri,Phys. Essays 8, 342 (1995).
H. Reichenbach,The Philosophy of Space and Time (Dover, New York, 1958). The quoted sentence is on p. 127.
M. Jammer, “Some fundamental problems is in the special theory of relativity,” inProblems in the Foundations of Physics, G. Toraldo di Francia, ed. (Socità Italiana di Fisica, Bologna, and North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 202–236.
K. Popper,Unended Quest, An Intellectual Biography (Fontana/Collins, Glasgow, 1976), p. 129.
H. Minkowski, address delivered at the 80th Assembly of German Natural Scientists and Physicians. Cologne, 21 September, 1908. English translation in H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl,The Principle of Relativity (Dover, New York, 1952).
J. A. Wheeler. “Delayed-choice experiments and the Bohr-Einstein dialog,” paper presented at the joint meeting of the American Philosophical Society and of the Royal Society, London, June 5, 1980.
R. Feynman,Phys. Rev. 76, 749 (1949).
L. W. Alvarez, inProceedings 1975International Symposium Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies (Stanford, 1975), p. 967.
F. Selleri,Found. Phys. 26, 641 (1996);Found. Phys. Lett. 9, 43 (1996).
F. Selleri,Il Giornale di Fisica 38, 67 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selleri, F. The relativity principle and the nature of time. Found Phys 27, 1527–1548 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551499
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551499