Skip to main content
Log in

An engineering analysis of rotating sieves for hybridoma cell retention ins stirred tank bioreactors

  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In contrast with microbial systems, no research has addressed the initial stages of mammalian cell transport and adsorption to anin vitro substratum as a function of growth and fluid flow conditions. (J.D.Bryers. 1990)

Abstract

The use of internal rotating sieves for perfused hybridoma culture offers unique advantages but has been up to now largely empirical. Calculations have been performed on a 15 1 spinfilter stirred tank in order to have an idea of hydrodynamic conditions inside and outside the rotating sieve. The large peripheral velocity value, resulting from sieve rotation (compared to axial and radial velocities) is expected to affect strongly sieve surface colonization by cells; this is confirmed by lab scale experiments, showing that cell colonization is prevented providing sieve rotation exceeds a defined value (around 0.6 m.s1 tip speed); the fluid removal force calculated under these conditions appears to be in the range of 10 pN, similar to the adhesion force already reported for mammalian cells attached to inorganic substrata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

filtration surface area (m2)

g:

gravity constant (m.s−2)

NQ :

impeller pumping number

Q:

volumetric pumping flowrate (m3.s−1)

r:

particle (cell) radius (m)

R:

spinfilter radius (m)

R′:

draught tube radius (m)

R″:

impeller radius (m)

Re:

Reynolds number

Recr :

critical Reynolds number

t:

time (s)

T:

shear stress (N.m−2)

v:

velocity (m.s−1)

κ:

friction factor

ε:

sieve open surface area ratio (porosity)

η:

dynamic viscosity (Pa.s)

ρ:

liquid density (kg.m−3)

ν:

kinematic viscosity (m2.s−1)

ω:

spinfilter angular velocity (s−1)

Ω:

impeller angular velocity (s−1)

References

  • Bird RB, Stewart WE and Lightfoot EN (1960) Transport Phenomena. Wiley Interscience.

  • Brooks DE, Miller JS, Seaman GVF and Vassar PS (1969) Some physico-chemical factors relevant to cellular interaction. J Cell Physiol 69: 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryers JD (1990) Biofilms in Biotechnology. In: Biofilms. Charaklis WG and Marshall KC (eds), pp. 733–773, Wiley Interscience.

  • Charaklis WG and Marshall KC (1990) Biofilms. Wiley Interscience.

  • Curtis ASG (1967) The Cell Surface: Its Molecular Role in Morphogenesis. London, Logos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doroszewski J (1980) Short-term and incomplete cell substrate adhesion. In: Cell adhesion and mobility. A Curtis and J Pitts (eds), pp. 171–197, Cambridge University Press.

  • Einav S and Lee SL (1973) Particles migration in laminar boundary layer flow. Int J Multiphase Flow 1: 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favre E and Péringer P (1991) Large scale production of monoclonal antibodies. Swiss Biotech 3: 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame KF and Hu WS (1990) Cell volume measurement as an estimation of mammalian cell biomass. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 36: 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmerfalb P, Thayer PS and Martin HE (1969) Spin filter culture: the propagation of mammalian cells in suspension. Science 164: 555–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroner KF, Nissinen V and Ziegler H (1987) Improved dynamic filtration of microbial suspensions. Biotechnology 5: 921–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee GM, Huard TK and Palsson BO (1988) Effect of anchorage dependency on growth rate and monoclonal antibody production of hybridoma cells. Biotechnology Letters 10 (5): 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin AA, Nguyen T and Miller WM (1991) A rapid method for counting cell nuclei using a particle sizer/counter. Biotechnol Techniques 5 (2): 153–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margaritis A and Wilke CR (1972) Engineering analysis of the rotorfermentor. Developments in Industrial Microbiology 13: 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroudas NC (1975) Adhesion and spreading of cells on charged surfaces. J Theoret Biol 49: 417–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazars C, Provenchere S, Pouget L, Pingeon L and Henno P (1989) Comparison of different cell culture systems for the production of monoclonal antibodies. In: Advances in animal cell biotechnology and biology for bioprocesses. Spier R and Griffiths JB (eds), pp 350–353, Butterworths.

  • Murase T, Iritani E, Chidphong P, Kano K, Atsumi K and Shirato M (1991) High speed microfiltration using a rotating, cylindrical, ceramic membrane. Int Chem Engin 31 (2): 370–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldshue J (1983) Fluid mixing technology, p. 172. Mac Graw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuveny S, Velez D, Macmillan JD and Miller L (1987) Factors affecting monoclonal antibody production in culture. Developments in Biological Standardization 66: 169–175.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richieri GV (1985) Measurement of biophysical properties of red blood cells by resistive pulse spectroscopy: Volume, shape, surface area and deformability. J Biophysic Biochem Methods 11: 117–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter PR (1980) The physical chemistry of the adhesion of bacteria and other cells. In: Cell adhesion and mobility. A. Curtis and J. Piffs (eds), pp. 103–135, Cambridge University Press.

  • Schlichting H (1979) Boundary layer theory, pp. 384–390, Mac Graw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortman K (1972) Physical procedures for the separation of animal cells. Ann Rev Phys Bioengin 1: 93–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varecka R and Scheirer W (1987) Use of a rotating wire cage for retention of animal cells in a perfusion fermentor. Dev Biol Standard 66: 269–272.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss L (1968) Studies on cellular adhesion in tissue culture. X. An experimental and theoretical approach to interaction forces between cells and glass. Exp Cell Res 53: 603–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Favre, E., Thaler, T. An engineering analysis of rotating sieves for hybridoma cell retention ins stirred tank bioreactors. Cytotechnology 9, 11–19 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521727

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521727

Key words

Navigation