Skip to main content
Log in

Improved subgrid scale model for dense turbulent solid-liquid two-phase flows

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dense solid-phase governing equations for two-phase flows are obtained by using the kinetic theory of gas molecules. Assuming that the solid-phase velocity distributions obey the Maxwell equations, the collision term for particles under dense two-phase flow conditions is also derived. In comparison with the governing equations of a dilute two-phase flow, the solid-particle's governing equations are developed for a dense turbulent solid-liquid flow by adopting some relevant terms from the dilute two-phase governing equations. Based on Cauchy-Helmholtz theorem and Smagorinsky model, a second-order dynamic sub-grid-scale (SGS) model, in which the sub-grid-scale stress is a function of both the strain-rate tensor and the rotation-rate tensor, is proposed to model the two-phase governing equations by applying dimension analyses. Applying the SIMPLEC algorithm and staggering grid system to the two-phase discretized governing equations and employing the slip boundary conditions on the walls, the velocity and pressure fields, and the volumetric concentration are calculated. The simulation results are in a fairly good agreement with experimental data in two operating cases in a conduit with a rectangular cross-section and these comparisons imply that these models are practical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou LX. Theory and Modeling of Turbulent Two-Phase Flow and Combustion. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1991 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Enwald H, Perirano E, et al. Eulerian two-phase flow theory applied to fluidization.Int J Multiphase Flow, 1996, 22(Suppl.): 21–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Y, Wilson JD, Lozowski EP. A trajectory simulation model for heavy particle motion in turbulent flow.ASME J Fluid Eng, 1989. 492–494

  4. Tang XL, Tang HF, Wu YL. Silt abrasion of hydraulic runner with silt-laden two-phase flow analysis. In: Mei ZY et al. eds. The Second International Symposium on Fluid Machinery and Fluid Engineering (2nd ISFMFE), Beijing: China Science & Technology Press, 2000, 344–348

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu YL, Oba R, Ikohagi T. Computation on turbulent dilute liquid-particle flows through a centrifugal impeller.Japanese J Multiphase Flow, 1994, 8(2): 118–125

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou LX, Chen T. Simulation of swirling gas-particle flows using USM andk-ε-k p two-phase turbulence models.Power Technology, 2001, 114: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Q, Squires KD. Large eddy simulation of particle deposition in a vertical turbulent channel flow.Int J Multiphase Flow, 1996, 22(4): 667–683

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Boivin M, Simonin O, Squire KD. On the prediction of gas-solid flows with two-way coupling using large eddy simulation.Physics of Fluids, 2000, 12(8): 2080–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ni JR, Wang GQ, Borthwick AJL. Kinetic theory for particles in dilute and dense solid-liquid flows.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 126(12): 893–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishii M. Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-Phase Flow. Paris: Eyrolles, 1975

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pai S-I. Two-phase Flow. New York: Vieweg, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu DY. Fluid Dynamics of Two-phase System. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1993 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Samuelsberg A, Hjertager BH. An experimental and numerical study of flow patterns in a circulating fluidized bed reactor.International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2000, 22(3): 575–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathiesen V, Solberg T, Hjertager TH. An experimental and computational study of multiphase flow behavior in a circulating fluidized bed.International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2000, 26: 387–419

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathiesen V, Solberg T, et al. Predictions of gas/particle flow with an Eulerian model including a realistic particle size distribution.Power Technology, 2000, 112: 34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benyahia S, Arastoopour H, et al. Simulation of particles and gas flow behavior in the riser section of a circulating fluidized bed using the kinetic theory approach for the particulate phase.Power Technology, 2000, 112: 24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Filippova O, Hanel D. Lattice-Boltzmann simulation of gas-particle flow in filters.Computers & Fluid, 1997, 26(7): 697–712

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up toRe τ=590.Phys Fluids, 1999, (11): 943

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Smagrinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations I.Mon Weather Review, 1963, 91(3): 99–165

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deardorff JW. A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers.J Fluid Mechanics, 1970, 41: 453–480

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Leith CE, Backscatter S. In a subgrid-scale model: plane shear mixing layer.Phys Fluids, 1990, 2: 297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Germano M, Piomelli U, et al. A dynamic subgridscale eddy viscosity model.Phys Fluids, 1991, A3(7): 1760–1765

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lilly DK. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method.Phys Fluids A, 1992, 4(3): 633–635

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zang Y, Street RL, Koseff JR. A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows.Phys Fluids A, 1993, 5(12): 3186–3196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghosal S, Lund TS, et al. A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows.J Fluid Mech, 1995, 286: 229–255

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Bardina J, Ferziger JH, Reynolds WC. Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation.AIAA Paper, 1980, (80): 1357

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chapman S, Cowling TG. The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Cases. Third Edition, London: Cambridge University Press, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vincenti WG, Kruger GH Jr. Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics, New York: John Wiley, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ding JX, Gidaspow D. A bubbling fluidization model using kinetic theory of granular flow.AIChE J, 1990, 36(4): 523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Soo SL. Particulated and Continuum: Multiphase Fluid Dynamics. New York: Hemisphere Publication Corp, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang ZY, Ning C. Experimental study of two-phase turbulent flow with hyperconcentration of coarse particles.Science in China, Ser A, 1984, 27(12): 1317–1327

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang ZY, Ning C. Experimental study of laminated load.Science in China, Ser A, 1985, 28(1): 102–112

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ferziger JH. Large eddy numerical simulation of turbulent flows.AIAA J, 1977, 15(9): 1261–1267

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50176022)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xuelin, T., Zhongdong, Q. & Yulin, W. Improved subgrid scale model for dense turbulent solid-liquid two-phase flows. Acta Mech Sinica 20, 354–365 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489373

Key Words

Navigation