Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic propagation simulation in complex media with non-rectangular irregular-grid finite-difference

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a finite-difference (FD) method with spatially non-rectangular irregular grids to simulate the elastic wave propagation. Staggered irregular grid finite difference operators with a second-order time and spatial accuracy are used to approximate the velocity-stress elastic wave equations. This method is very simple and the cost of computing time is not much. Complicated geometries like curved thin layers, cased borehole and nonplanar interfaces may be treated with non-rectangular irregular grids in a more flexible way. Unlike the multi-grid scheme, this method requires no interpolation between the fine and coarse grids and all grids are computed at the same spatial iteration. Compared with the rectangular irregular grid FD, the spurious diffractions from “staircase” interfaces can easily be eliminated without using finer grids. Dispersion and stability conditions of the proposed method can be established in a similar form as for the rectangular irregular grid scheme. The Higdon's absorbing boundary condition is adopted to eliminate boundary reflections. Numerical simulations show that this method has satisfactory stability and accuracy in simulating wave propagation near rough solid-fluid interfaces. The computation costs are less than those using a regular grid and rectangular grid FD method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alterman Z, Karal FC Jr. Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite difference methods.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1968, 58(1): 367–398

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boore DM. Finite difference methods for seismic wave propagation in heterogeneous materials. In: Bolt BA ed. Method in Computational Physics. Academic Press, Inc, 1972

  3. Alford RM, Kelly KR, Boore DM. Accuracy of finite-difference modeling of the acoustic wave equation.Geophysics, 1974, 39: 834–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly KR, Ward RW, Treitel S, et al. Synthetic seismograms, a finite difference approach.Geophysics, 1976, 41: 2–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Virieux J. SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method.Geophysics, 1984, 49: 1933–1942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Virieux J. I-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media. velocity-stress finite-difference method.Geophysics, 1986, 51: 889–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levander Alan R. Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms.Geophysics, 1988, 53: 1425–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dablain MA. The application of high-order differencing to the scalar wave equation.Geophysics, 1986, 51: 54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graves RW. Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggered-grid finite differences.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1996, 86: 1091–1106

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Shortley GH, Weller R. Numerical solution of Laplace's equation.J Appl Phys, 1938, 9: 334–348

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jastram C, Tessmer E. Elastic modeling on a grid with vertically varying spacing.Geophys Prosp, 1994, 42: 357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Falk J, Tessmer E, Gajevski D. Tube wave modeling by the finite-differences method with varying grid spacing.Pageoph, 1996, 14: 77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tessmer E, Kosloff D, Behle A. Elastic wave propagation simulation in the presence surface topography.Geophys J Internat, 1992, 108: 621–632

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hestholm SO, Ruud BO. 2-D Finite-difference elastic wave modeling including surface topography.Geophys Prosp, 1994, 42: 371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mufti IR. Large-scale three-dimensional seismic models and their interpretive significance.Geophysics, 1990, 55(9): 1166–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oprsal I, Zahradnik J. Elastic finite-difference method for irregular grids.Geophysics, 1999, 64(1): 240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pitarka A. 3D elastic finite-difference modeling of seismic motion using staggered grids with nonuniform spacing.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1999, 89(1): 54–68

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Nordström J,m Carpenter MH. High-order finite difference methods, multidimensioinal linear problems and curvilinear coordinates.Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 173: 149–174

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Higdon RL. Absorbing boundary conditions for difference approximations to the multidimensional wave equation.Math Comp, 1986, 47: 437–459

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weitao, S., Huizhu, Y. Seismic propagation simulation in complex media with non-rectangular irregular-grid finite-difference. Acta Mech Sinica 20, 299–306 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486722

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486722

Key Words

Navigation