Advertisement

Applied Mathematics and Mechanics

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 1466–1474 | Cite as

Lower bound limit analysis of three-dimensional elastoplastic structures by boundary element method

  • Liu Ying-hua
  • Zhang Xiao-feng
  • Cen Zhang-zhi
Article

Abstract

Based on the lower bound theorem of limit analysis, a solution procedure for limit analysis of three-dimensional elastoplastic structures was established using conventional boundary element method (BEM). The elastic stress field for lower bound limit analysis was computed directly by three-dimensional boundary element method (3-D BEM). The self-equilibrium stress field was constructed by the linear combination of several self-equilibrium “basis vectors” which can be computed by elastic-plastic incremental iteration of 3-D BEM analysis. The lower bound limit analysis problem was finally reduced to a series of nonlinear programming sub-problems with relatively few optimal variables. The complex method was used to solve the nonlinear programming sub-problems. The numerical results show that the present solution procedure has good accuracy and high efficiency.

Key words

BEM lower bound limit analysis self-equilibrium stress field nonlinear programming complex method 

Chinese Library Classification number

O344.5 

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

74L10 74S15 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    LIU Ying-hua, CEN Zhang-zhi, XU Bin-ye. Upper bound limit analysis of 3-D structures using finite element method[J].Journal of Tsinghua University, 1996,36, (3):47–53 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Maier G, Polizzotto C. A boundary element approach to limit analysis[A]., In: Brebbia C A Futagami T, Tanaka M Eds.Boundary Elements [C]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1983, 551–556.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Swedlow J L, Cruse T A. Formulation of boundary integral equations for three dimensional elastoplastic flow [J].Int J Solids Struct, 1971,7 (12):1673–1683.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Maier G, Novati G. Elastic-plastic boundary element analysis as a linear complementarity problem [J].Appl Math Modelling, 1983,7 (2): 74–82.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cen Z, Wang X, Du Q. A coupled finite element-boundary element method for three dimensional elastoplasticity analysis [A]. In: Du Q Ed., On BEM in Eng'g [C]. Beijing: Pergamon Press, 1986, 311–318.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    CEN Zhang-zhi, WANG Xu-cheng, DU Qing-hua. The elastoplastic, analysis by the coupling of boundary element method to finite element method [J].Journal of Tsinghua University, 1988,28 (2):34–43. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Martin J B:Plasticity: Foundation and General Results [M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1975, 379–526.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zhang, X, Liu Y, Cen Z. A solution procedure for lower bound limit and shakedown analysis by SGBEM[J].Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2000,14(2): 118–129.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    XI Shao-lin, ZHAO Feng-zhi.Computational Methods of Optimization [M]. Shanghai Science and Technology Press of Shanghai, 1983, 370–377. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Borges L A, Zouain N, Huespe A E. A nonlinear optimization procedure for limit analysis[J].Eur J Mech, A/Solids, 1996,15 (3):487–512.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Editorial Committee of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liu Ying-hua
    • 1
  • Zhang Xiao-feng
    • 1
  • Cen Zhang-zhi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering MechanicsTsinghua UniversityBeijingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations