Skip to main content
Log in

Value of CT scanning in outpatients: preliminary report on a controlled study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of 100 consecutive new outpatients attending the neuroradiology service for a cranial CT scan between 1 October and 24 December 1984 were analyzed. On the day of the investigation each patient was examined by a neurologist, who gave his opinion on the value of a CT scan. The neurologist's ratings were then compared with the CT reports. More than 2/3 of the requests for CT were useless and could have been avoided by thorough clinical evaluation of the patients and full awareness of what CT scanning can contribute to diagnosis and treatment.

Sommario

Sono stati esaminati 100 pazienti che si sono rivolti al Servizio di Neuroradiologia per essere sottoposti a TAC del cranio in regime ambulatoriale dal 1o Ottobre al 24 Dicembre 1984. Durante la valutazione neurologica clinica preliminare, eseguita all'interno del Servizio, è stata espressa l'opinione sulla opportunità o meno dell'esame stesso, quindi essa è stata confrontata con il reperto TAC. I dati finora raccolti indicano che più di due terzi degli esami avrebbero potuto essere evitati con una più corretta conoscenza sia del caso clinico che delle indicazioni alla metodica TAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caillé J.M., Billerey J., Thierry J.P., Guibert-Trainer F., Piton J.:Efficacité de l'examen scanographique normal. J. Neurorad. 10, 136–140, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wortzman G. Management of neuroradiological investigations in relation to the clinical signs. J. Neurorad. 10, 195–199, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hillier L., Baker Cranial CT in the investigation of headache cost-effectiveness for brain tumors. J. Neurorad. 10, 112–116, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gastaut H., Raybaud CH., Gomez-Almanzar M. Efficacité du “tri clinique et électroencephalographique” pour le diagnostic étiologique des épilepsies. J. Neurorad. 10, 122–126, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradshaw J.R., Thomson J.L.G., Campbell M.J.:Computed tomography in the investigation of dementia. Br.Med.J. 286, 277–280, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fryback D.G. A conceptual model for output measures in cost-effectiveness evaluation of diagnostic imaging. J.Neurorad. 10, 94–96, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner J.L. Economic evaluation in Neuroradiology. J.Neurorad. 10, 96–100, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. France G. I criteri per valutare i costi generati dalle apparecchiature mediche. Il Polso, 10, 70–73, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taguki Y. Prospects for conservative treatment of chronic subdural haematomas. Investigation of the absorption process. No Shinkei Geka 10, 999–1005, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kurti X., Xhumari A., Petrela M. Bilateral chronic subdural haematomas; surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 62(1–2), 87–90, 1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchionni, F., Ricci, S., Luccioli, R. et al. Value of CT scanning in outpatients: preliminary report on a controlled study. Ital J Neuro Sci 6, 411–413 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331032

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331032

Key-Words

Navigation