Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correcting for unreliability in nonlinear models of attitude change

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper opens with a brief discussion of the problems in testing nonlinear models of attitude change. The regression artifacts produced by unreliability are shown in both the linear and nonlinear case. Classical solutions for the linear case are quickly reviewed. A “new” solution to the linear case is presented and applied to the nonlinear case. It is shown to work well under a broad set of conditions. Regression artifacts in bivariate regression are then discussed. If the predictors are independent, then the univariate correction procedure can be applied to each predictor separately. But if the predictors are correlated, a joint correction procedure must be used. One such procedure is defined and shown to work perfectly in the case of linear regression and reasonably well in a broad set of conditions in which the regression is nonlinear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, N. H. Test of a model for opinion change.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959,59, 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. & Hovland, C. I. The representation of order effects in communications research. In C. I. Hovland (Ed.),The order of presentation in persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957, pp. 158–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.),Problems in measuring change. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E. & Cohen, S. H. Mathematical models of attitude change in the passive communication context. Unpublished manuscript, 1972, pp. 250.

  • Lord, F. M. The measurement of growth.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1956,16, 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. An empirical study of the normality and independence of errors of measurement in test scores.Psychometrika, 1960,25, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. E.The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. & Tannenbaum, P. E. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.Psychological Review, 1955,62, 42–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, P. E. Attitudes toward source and concept as factors in attitude change through communications. Unpublished dissertation, University of Illinois, 1953.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Michigan State University, USA

    John E. Hunter

  2. West Virginia University, USA

    Stanley H. Cohen

Authors
  1. John E. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stanley H. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, J.E., Cohen, S.H. Correcting for unreliability in nonlinear models of attitude change. Psychometrika 39, 445–468 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291668

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291668

Keywords

Search

Navigation