Skip to main content
Log in

The unreasonable effectiveness of physical intuition: Success while ignoring objections

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The process of theory development in physics is a very complex one. The best scientists sometimes proceed on the basis of their physical intuition, ignoring serious conceptual or mathematical objections well known to them at the time.The results soon justify their actions: but the removal of these objections is often not possible for a very long time. Four examples are presented: Newton, Schrödinger, Dirac, Dyson. Some thoughts on this “unreasonableness≓ are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. P. Wigner “The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences,≓Commun. Pure Appl. Math. XIII, 1–14 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kantorovich,Scientific Discovery (State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. McMullin,Newton on Matter and Activity (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Letter from Newton to Bentley, pp. 302–303 in I. B. Cohen,Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157 (1945) and21, 425 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vol. 5 (Springer, Berlin, 1987), pp. 419–430; unfortunately, there are several misprints in the equations of this section.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reference 6, pp. 430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Abraham, “Die Grundhypothesen der Elektronentheorie,≓Phys. Z. 5 576–579 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Sommerfeld,Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. p. 99 (1904), p. 201 (1905).

  10. T. Erber,Fortschr. Phys. 9, 343–392 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ph. Pearle, “Classical electron models,≓ inElectromagnetism, D. Teplitz, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1982) pp. 211–295.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. A. M. Dirac, “Classical theory of radiating electrons,≓Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 167, 148–169 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Rohrlich, “The Art of doing physics in Dirac's way≓, in B. Kursunogluet al., eds.High Energy Physics (Plenum Press, New York, 1985), pp. 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Levine, E. J. Moniz, and D. H. Sharp,Am. J. Phys. 45, 75–78 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. D. Yaghjian,Relativistic Dynamics of a Charged Sphere (Springer Berlin 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. J. Moniz and D. H. Sharp,Phys. Rev. 15, 2850 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. S. Schweber,QED and the Men Who Made It (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. A. Bethe,Phys. Rev. 72, 339–341 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. J. Dyson,Phys. Rev. 75, 486–502, 1736–1755 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Larry Horwitz, an old friend and colleague, and an excellent mathematical physicist. May his sixty-fifth birthday be followed by many more.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohrlich, F. The unreasonable effectiveness of physical intuition: Success while ignoring objections. Found Phys 26, 1617–1626 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282125

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282125

Keywords

Navigation