Abstract
The content of gentamicin in pharmaceuticals is measured by the high pressure liquid Chromatographic technique described in the monographs for Gentamicin Sulphate and Gentamicin Injection in the British Pharmacopoeia 1980 for the determination of the composition of gentamicin. Calculation procedures are presented to transform this qualitative high pressure liquid Chromatographic procedure for the assay of gentamicin so that it gives results in terms of potency. A comparison is made of this data with the results of the microbiological assay according to the European Pharmacopoeia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous. European Pharmacopoeia. 2nd Edition. Sainte Ruffine: Maisonneuve SA.
Anonymous. British Pharmacopoeia. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1980.
Anonymous. The United States Pharmacopeia XXI. Bethesda: United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., 1985.
Claes PJ, Busson R, Vanderhaeghe H. Determination of the component ratio of commercial gentamicins by high-performance liquid chromatography using precolumn derivatization. J Chromatogr 1984;298:445–57.
Claes P, Vanderhaeghe H. Collaborative study on the assignment of Gentamicin Sulphate component ratios. Pharmacopeial Forum 1987;13:2977–86.
Anonymous. Proposal for revision of monograph no. 330 Gentamicin Sulphate. Pharmeuropa 1987 (Nov):18–21.
Albracht JH, De Wit MS. Analysis of gentamicin in raw material and in pharmaceutical preparations by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 1987;389:306–11.
Weinstein MJ, Wagman GH. Antibiotics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1978:167–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
On the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of RIGO (director: H.M. Smits)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Duijn, J.W., Barends, D.M., Groot, D.W. et al. High pressure liquid chromatographic determination with ultraviolet detection of gentamicin and correlation with the microbiological potency. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition 10, 267–271 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02219666
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02219666