Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of ovarian stimulation protocol is related to IVF treatment outcome in women 35 years of age and older

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess if the woman's age influenced IVF treatment outcome when a long GnRHa-hMG or a CC-hMG ovarian stimulation protocol was used. Two hundred women were included in the study, 100 women under the age of 35 and 100 women 35 years of age and older (mean 31.8 years and 36.7 years respectively). In the younger group as well as in the older group 50 women were stimulated according to a GnRHahMG protocol and 50 women received a CC-hMG regimen.

Results

Significant differences between stimulation protocols were found in the older group for the mean numbers of oocytes recovered (4.7 vs 3.0), preembryos obtained (3.2 vs 2.0) and replaced (2.3 vs 1.7), as well as pregnancy (30 % vs 10 %) and delivery (24 % vs 4 %) rates per replacement.

Conclusion

It is concluded that women over 35 years of age seem to have a more favorable outcome of IVF treatment when using a long GnRHa-hMG protocol compared with CC-hMG, while this difference was not as obvious and lacking statistical significance under the age of 35.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Polson DW, MacLachlan V, Krapez JA, Wood C, Healy DL: A controlled study of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (buserelin acetate) for folliculogenesis in routine in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 1991;56:509–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdalla HI, Ahuja KK, Leonard T, Morris NN, Honour JW, Jacobs HS: Comparative trial of luteinizing hormonereleasing hormone analog/human menopausal gonadotropin and clomophene citrate/human menopausal gonadotropin in an assisted conception program. Fertil Steril 1990;53:473–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kubik CJ, Guzick DS, Berga SL, Zeleznik AJ: Randomizrd, prospective trial of leuprolide acetate and conventional superovulation in first cycles of in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril 1990;54:836–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundström P, Wramsby, H: Evaluation of variations in pregnancy rates, implantation rates and early abortion rates within an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod 1989;4:443–445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Federation CECOS, Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ: Female fecundity as a function of age: results of artificial insemination in 2193 nulliparous women with azoospermic husbands. N Engl J Med 1982;306:404–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meldrum DR: Female reproductive aging—ovarian and uterine factors. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams M, Garissi GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, Fox J, Schreiner-Engel P, Hoffman GE, Grunfeld L: An insight into early reproductive processes through the in vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;79: 408–414

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J, Fehilly CB, Purdy JM, Slater JM, Steptoe PC, Webster JM: Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J in Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1984;1:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. Piette C, de Mouzon J, Bachelot A, Spira A: In-vitro fertilization: influence of women's age on pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1990;5:56–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laufer N, Pratt BM, DeCherney AH, Naftolin F, Merino M, Markert CL: The in vivo and in vitro effects of clomiphene citrate on ovulation, fertilization, and development of cultured mouse oocytes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;147:636–639

    Google Scholar 

  11. Macnamee MC, Howles CM, Edwards RG: Pregnancies after IVF when high tonic LH is reduced by long-term treatment with GnRH agonist. Hum Reprod 1987;2:569–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chetkowski RJ, Rode RA, Burruel V, Ness TE: The effect of pituitary suppression and the women's age on embryo viability and uterine receptivity. Fertil Steril 1991;56:1095–1103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoine JM, Salat-Baroux J, Alvarez S, Cornet D, Tibi Ch, Mandelbaum J, Plachot M: Ovarian stimulation using human menopausal gonadotropins with or without LHRH analogues in a long protocol for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomised comparison. Hum Reprod 1990;5:565–569

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes EG, Fedorkow DM, Daya S, Sagle MA, Van de Koppel P, Collins JA: The routine use of gonadotropinreleasing hormone agonist prior to in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 1992;58:888–896

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saunders DM, Lancaster PAL, Pedisich L: Increased pregnancy failure rates after clomiphene following assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1154–1158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril 1992;58:249–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rizk B, Smitz J: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after superovulation using GnRH agonist for IVF and related procedures. Hum Reprod 1992;7:320–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Csemiczky, G., Hagenfeldt, K. & Wramsby, H. Selection of ovarian stimulation protocol is related to IVF treatment outcome in women 35 years of age and older. J Assist Reprod Genet 11, 474–477 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215711

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02215711

Key words

Navigation