Advertisement

Use of coculture with cumulus cells in insemination medium in human in vitro fertilization (IVF)

  • Patrick Quinn
Clinical Assisted Reproduction

Abstract

Purpose

In an initial trial, 16 of 33 (48%) bipronuclear human zygotes left in culture in the insemination drop from which they had originated developed to fully expanded blastocysts.

Results

This method was subsequently used for all supernumerary embryos judged unsuitable for replacement or cryopreservation on Day 1, 2, or 3 of development. Over a 4-year period, embryos reaching the fully expanded blastocyst stage were cryopreserved. Of 113 such blastocysts thawed, 81 survived (72%), and upon transfer to 52 patients, 8 clinical pregnancies were established (15%), of which 6 were live births. Subsequently, following modification of some culture parameters, 60 patients had 296 supernumerary embryos cultured for 6 days; 43 of these patients (72%) had 148 embryos (50%) that cavitated and 134 (45%) of these cavitating embryos were judged to be fully expanded blastocycts; 125 (42%) of these embryos were cryopreserved.

Conclusion

The blastocyst formation rate is similar to that reported by others using conventional culture procedures or coculture on Vero or other cell types. I conclude that cumulus cells are a ready source of feeder cells for the coculture of human embryos.

Key words

coculture in vitro fertilization blastocyst cumulus cell 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiemer KE, Cohen J, Wiker SR, Malter HE, Wright G, Godke RA: Coculture of human zygotes on fetal bovine uterine fibroblasts; embryonic morphology and implantation. Fertil Steril 1989;52:503–508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bongso A, Ng S-C, Sathananthan H, Lian NP, Rauff M, Ratnam S: Improved quality of human embryos when cocultured with human ampullary cells. Hum Reprod 1989;4:706–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thibodeaux JK, Godke RA: In vitro enhancement of earlystage embryos with co-culture. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:364–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hardy K, Martin KL, Leese HJ, Winston RML, Handyside AH: Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum Reprod 1990;5:708–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolton VN: Controversies and opinions in embryo culture: two-to four-cell transfer vs blastocyst. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:506–508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bongso A, Ng S-C, Ratnam S: Co-culture: Their relevance to assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1990;5:893–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quinn P, Stone BA, Marrs RP: Suboptimal laboratory conditions can affect pregnancy outcome after embryo transfer on day 1 or 2 after insemination in vitro. Fertil Steril 1990;53:168–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinn P, Kerin JF, Warnes GM: Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the compostion of human tubal fluid. Fertil Steril 1985;44:493–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kerin JFP, Warnes GM, Quinn P, Jeffrey R, Godfrey B, Broom TJ, McEvoy M, Kirby C, Johnson M, Cox LW: The effect of Clomid induced superovulation on human fpllicular and luteal function for extracorporeal fertilization and embryo transfer. Clin Reprod Fertil 1983;2:129–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen J, Simons RF, Edwards RG, Fehilly CB, Fishel SB: Pregnancies following the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1985;2:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menezo Y, Nicollet B, Herbaut N, Andre D: Freezing cocultured human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 1992;58:977–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quinn P: Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes.In Infertility: Evaluation and Treatment, WR Keye, RJ Chang, RW Rebar, MR Soules (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1994; Chap 56Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiemer KE, Cohen J, Amborski GF, Wright G, Wiker S, Munyakazi L, Godke RA: In-vitro development and implantation of human embryos following culture on fetal bovine uterine fibroblast cells. Hum Reprod 1989;4:595–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Menezo YJR, Guerin J-F, Czyba J-C: Improvement of human early embryo development in vitro by coculture on monolayers of Vero cells. Biol Reprod 1990;42:301–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Menezo Y, Hazout A, Dumont M, Herbaut N, Nicollet B: Coculture of embryos on Vero cells and transfer of blastocysts in humans. Hum Reprod 1992;Suppl 1:101–106Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen J: Co-culture of human embryos with “helper” cells.In Third Annual in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, a Comprehensive Update—1990. Los Angeles, Department of Continuing Education in Health Sciences, UCLA Extension, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCLA School of Medicine, 1990, pp 188–203Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plachot M, Mandelbaum J: Oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryonic growth in vitro. Br Med Bull 1990;46:675–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ouhibi N, Hamidi J, Guillaud J, Menezo Y: Co-culture of 1-cell mouse embryos on different cell supports. Hum Reprod 1990;5:737–743PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rexroad CE: Co-culture of domestic animal embryos. Theriogenology 1989;31:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allen RL, Wright RWJ: In vitro development of porcine embryos in co-culture with endometrial cell monolayers or culture supernatants. Theriogenology 1984;21:219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rexroad CE, Powell A: Coculture of ovine embryos with oviductal cells in medium 199. J Anim Sci 1988;66:947–953PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ellington JE, Carney EW, Farrell PB, Simkin ME, Foote RH: Bovine 1–2-cell embryo development using a simple medium in three oviduct epithelial cell coculture systems. Biol Reprod 1990;43:97–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goto K, Kajihara Y, Kosaka S, Koba M, Nakanishi Y, Ogawa K: Pregnancies after co-culture of cumulus cells with bovine embryos derived from in-vitro fertilization of in-vitro matured folicullar oocytes. J Reprod Fert 1988;83:753–758Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fukuda Y, Ichikawa M, Naito K, Toyoda Y: Birth of normal calves resulting from bovine oocytes matured, fertilized, and cultured with cumulus cells in vitro up to the blastocyst stage. Biol Reprod 1990;42:114–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quinn P: Media and protein supplements.In Second Annual in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, a Comprehensive Update—1989. Los Angeles, Department of continuing Education in Health Sciences, UCLA Extension, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecplogy, UCLA School of Medicine, 1989, pp 142–150Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quinn P: Success of oocyte and embryo freezing and its effect on outcome with in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1990;8:272–280Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Quinn P: Co-culture of human embryos.In Reproductive Biology: Clinical and Basic Perspectives. Part II. Gamete Activation, Fertilization and Preimplantation Development. 24th Annual Postgraduate Course, American Fertility Society, 1991, pp 88–103Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Abbaas A: Coculture of human fertilized oocytes with its own cumulus cells. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society, 1992, abstr 0-034Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Freeman MR, Whitworth CM, Hill GA: A prospective randomized comparison of human embryo development during granulosalutein cell coculture. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society 1993, abstr 0-016Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lopata A: The neglected human blastocyst. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:508–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muggleton-Harris AL, Findlay I, Whittingham DG: Improvement of the culture conditions for the development of human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1990;5:217–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Noda Y: Embryo development in vitro. Assist Reprod Rev 1992;2:9–15Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bolton VN, Hawes SM, Taylor CT, Parsons JH: Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: an analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1989;6:30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sjogren A, Sjoblom P, Hamberger L: Culture of human spare preembryos; association between blastocyst formation and pregnancy. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:41–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wiemer KE, Hoffman DI, Maxson WS, Eager S, Muhlberger B, Fiore I, Cuervo M: Embryonic morphology and rate of implantation of human embryos following co-culture on bovine oviductal epithelial cells. Hum Reprod 1993;8:97–101Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gandolfi F, Brevini TAL, Richardson L, Brown CR, Moor RM: Characterization of proteins secreted by sheep oviduct epithelial cells and their function in embryonic development. Development 1989;106:303–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lippes J, van Oss CJ, Bronson PM, Alfonso LA, Dacalos EA, Lucero R: Human oviductal fluid proteins. II. Preparation of an antiserum to a human oviductal fluid protein; Existence of autoantibodies against it in some sera. Fertil Steril 1983;39:824–828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Verhage HG, Fazleabas AT, Donnelly K: The in vitro synthesis and release of proteins by the human oviduct. Endocrinology 1988;122:1639–1645PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bar-Ami S, Gitay-Goren H, Brandes JM: Different morphological and steroidogenic patterns in oocyte/cumulus-corona cell complexes aspirated at in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 1989;41:761–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bavister BD: Co-culture for embryo development: Is it really necessary? Hum Reprod 1992;7:1339–1341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bavister BD: Response to the use of co-culture for embryo development. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1160–1162Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bongso A, Fong C-Y, Ng S-C, Ratnam S: The search for improved in-vitro systems should not be ignored: Embryo co-culture may be one of them. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1155–1160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sakkas D, Jaquenoud N, Leppens G, Campana A: Comparison of results after in vitro fertilized human embryos are cultured in routine medium and in coculture on Vero cells: a randomized study. Fertil Steril 1994;61:521–525PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Quinn
    • 1
  1. 1.San Fernando Valley Fertility & Reproductive CenterTarzana

Personalised recommendations