Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of dam's strain on the intrauterine craniofacial growth of mouse fetuses

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The maternal effect is one of the important factors in mammalian growth in conjunction with the genetic effect. The present study investigated the prenatal maternal effect of a dam on the intrauterine craniofacial growth of a mouse fetus using embryo transfer and cephalometry. DDD/Qdj strain mouse embryos were transferred to four strains of recipient female mice (DDD/Qdj, C3H/Qdj, C57BL/Qdj, and DBA/1J Sea). Just after parturition cephalometric observation of the newborn offspring, which developed in the uteri of the four strains of dams, was performed and then the craniofacial size of the newborn offspring was calculated on the lateral cephalogram. Statistical analyses were performed to examine the correlation between the dam's weight and the craniofacial size of the newborn offspring, to test the significance of the effect of the dam's strain on the craniofacial size of the newborn offspring, and to evaluate the interstrain difference of the intrauterine craniofacial growth of the mouse fetuses.

Results

It was disclosed that there were a direct relation between the dam's weight and the craniofacial size of the newborn offspring, a significant effect of the dam's strain on the craniofacial size of the newborn offspring, and a significant interstrain difference in the craniofacial size of the newborn offspring after eliminating the effects of litter size and gestation period on the craniofacial size of the newborn offspring (DDD/Qdj > C3H/Qdj = C57BL/ Qdj > DBA/1J Sea).

Conclusion

Thus, it could be concluded that the four strains of dams affected differently the intrauterine craniofacial growth of the DDD/Qdj strain fetuses through each uterine condition, indicating that the dam's weight played an important role as one of the prenatal maternal effects on the intrauterine craniofacial growth of mouse fetuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nonaka K, Nakata M: Genetic variation and craniofacial growth in inbred rats. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1984;4:271–302

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nonaka K, Nakata M: Genetic and environment factors in the longitudinal growth of rats. I. Body weight and overall craniofacial size. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1988;8:319–327

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nonaka K, Matsumoto T, Nakata M. Genetic and environment factors in the longitudinal growth of rats. II. Ventrodorsal craniofacial size. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1988;8:329–335

    Google Scholar 

  4. El Oksh HA: Prenatal and postnatal maternal influence on growth in mice. Genetics 1967;57:79–94

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heape W: Preliminary note on the transplantation and growth of mammalian ova within a uterine foster mother. Proc Roy Soc London 1890;48:457–458

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholas JS: Development of transplanted rat eggs. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1933;30:1111–1113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fekete E: Observation on three functional tests in a hightumor and low-tumor strain of mice. Am J Cancer 1940;38:234–238

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jenkins AS, Anderson GB: Effects of embryo survival of short-term exposure to the uterine environment of two selected lines of mice. Lab Anim Sci 1990;40:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roth VL, Klein MS: Maternal effects on body size of large insular peromyscus maniculatus evidence from embryo transfer experiments. J Mammal 1990;67:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barkley MS, FitzGerald R: Influence of embryonic and maternal genotype on gestational events in the mouse. J Reprod Fert 1990;89:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pomp D, Cowley DE, Eisen EJ, Atchley WR, Howkins-Brown D: Donor and recipient genotype and heterosis effects on survival and prenatal growth of transferred mouse embryos. J Reprod Fert 1989;86:493–500

    Google Scholar 

  12. Petters RM, Eisen EJ, Pomp D, Lucy MC: Cytoplasmic effects on selection response for increased growth rate in mice. J Anim Sci 1988;66:287–292

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cowly DE, Pomp D, Atchley WR, Eisen EJ, Howkins-Brown D: The impact of maternal uterine genotype on postnatal growth and adult body size in mice. Genetics 1989;122:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  14. McLaren A, Michie D: An effect of the uterine environment upon skeletal morphology in the mouse. Nature 1958;181:1147–1148

    Google Scholar 

  15. Atchley WR, Logsdon TR, Cowley DE, Eisen EJ: Uterine effects, epigenetics, and postnatal skeletal development in the mouse. Evolution 1991:45:891–909

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nonaka K, Sasaki Y, Yanagita K, Matsumoto T, Watanabe Y, Nakata M: II. Intrauterine effect of dam on prenatal development of craniofacial complex of mouse embryo. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1993;13:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sasaki Y, Nonaka K, Nakata M: The effect of four strains of recipients on the intrauterine growth of the mandible in mouse fetuses. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1994;13:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nonaka K, Matsumoto T, Yanagita K, Sasaki Y, Watanabe Y, Nagata E, Nakata M: I. Genetic and environmental effects on preimplantational development of mouse embryo in vitro. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1993;13:202–205

    Google Scholar 

  19. Whittingham JG: Culture of mouse ova. J Reprod Fert Suppl 1971;14:7–21

    Google Scholar 

  20. Biggers JD, Whitten WK, Whittingham DG: The culture of mouse embryos in vitro.In Methods in Mammalian Embryology, Daniel JC (ed). San Fransisco, Freeman, 1971, pp 88–116

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sneath PHA: Trend-surface analysis of transformation grids. J Zool 1967;151:65–122

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dahlberg G: Statistical method used.In Statistical methods for medical biological students, Dahlberg G (ed). London, Allen and Unwin, 1940, pp 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nagai J, Watanabe S, Kobayashi J, Sugawara S: Intra uterine survival and growth of Wister × Brown Norway rat embryo. Theriogenol 1985;23:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  24. Iida K, Mizuma Y, Nagai J: Heterosis in survival of transferred mouse embryos. Z Versuchstierkd 1987;27:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aitken RJ, Bowman P, Gauld I: The effects of synchronous and asynchronous egg transfer on fetal weight in mice selected for large and small body weight. J Embryo Exp Morphol 1977;37:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  26. Talbert GB, Krohn PL: Effects of maternal age on viability of ova and uterine support of pregnancy in mice. J Reprod Fert 1966;11:399–406

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gosden RG: Survival of transferred C57BL mouse embryos—Effects of age of donor and recipient. Fertil Steril 1974;25:348–351

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wiebold JL, Anderson GB: The effect of recipient age on the success of embryo transfer in mice. Lab Anim Sci 1986;36:161–163

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith DW: Basics and nature of growth.In Growth and Its Disorders, Schaffer AJ, Markowitz M (eds). Philadelphia, London, Toronto, W.B. Saunders, 1977, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bakker H, Wallinga H, Politiek RD: Reproduction and body weight of mice after long-term selection for large litter size. J Anim Sci 1978;46:1572–1580

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mori T, Shimizu H, Ueda J, Hachinohe Y: Effect of the selection for increased body weight on the reproductive traits of the female mice. Mem Faculty Agr Hokkaido Univ 1985;14:403–408

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lande RB: Genetic and phenotypic relationships between ovulation rate and body weight in the mouse. Genet Res 1970;15:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  33. Durran BS, Eisen EJ, Ulberg LC: Ovulation rate, embryo survival and ovarian sensitivity to gonadotrophins in mice selected for litter size and body weight. J Reprod Fert 1980;59:329–339

    Google Scholar 

  34. Elliott DS: Change in the reproductive processes of mice selected for large and small body size. J Reprod Fert 1968;17:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brumby PJ: The influence of the maternal environmental on growth in mice. Heredity 1960;14:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  36. Al-Murrani WK, Roberts RC: Maternal effects on body weight in mice selected for large and small size. Genet Res Cambr 1978;32:295–302

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nonaka K, Sasada H, Nagai J: Effects of age and body mass of recipients on survival of transferred embryos in mice. Z Versuchstiekd 1990:33:193–195

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vorherr RH: Factors influencing fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142(3):577–587

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schlager G, Weibust RS: Genetic control of blood pressure in mice. Genetics 1967;55:497–506

    Google Scholar 

  40. Maurer RR, Echternkamp SE: Hormonal asynchrony and embryonic development. Theriogenology 1982;17:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schwartz Z, Soskolne WA, Neubauer T, Goldstein M: Direct and sex-specific enhancement of bone formation and calcification by sex steroids in fetal mice long born in vitro (biochemical and morphometric study). Endocrinology 1991;129(3):1167–1174

    Google Scholar 

  42. Michael SD, Geschwind II, Bradford GE, Stabenfeldt GH: Pregnancy in mice selected for small litter size; Reproductive hormone levels and effect of exogenous hormones. Fertil Steril 1975;12:400–407

    Google Scholar 

  43. Barkley MS, Geschwind II, Bradford GE: The gestational pattern of estradiol, testosterone and progesterone secretion in selected strains of mice. Biol Reprod 1979;20:733–738

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nonaka, K., Sasaki, Y., Yanagita, KI. et al. The effect of dam's strain on the intrauterine craniofacial growth of mouse fetuses. J Assist Reprod Genet 11, 359–366 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214142

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214142

Key words

Navigation