Journal of Fusion Energy

, Volume 13, Issue 2–3, pp 181–183 | Cite as

Criteria for practical fusion power systems: Report from the EPRI fusion panel

  • J. Kaslow
  • M. Brown
  • R. Hirsch
  • R. izzo
  • J. McCann
  • D. McCloud
  • B. Muston
  • A. PetersonJr.
  • S. Rosen
  • T. Schneider
  • P. Skrgic
  • B. Snow
Article

Abstract

Electric utilities are keenly interested in the promise of fusion: large-scale electricity production anywhere, with virtually no natural resource depletion or environmental pollution. To expedite development of commercially viable fusion systems, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)—the R&D wing of the U.S. electric utility industry—recently convened a panel of top utility R&D managers and executive officers to identify the key criteria that must be met by fusion plants in order to be acceptable to utilities. The panel's findings, summarized in this report, emphasize competitive economics, positive public perception, and regulatory simplicity.

Key Words

Economics public acceptance regulatory simplicity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The following EPRI reports are available from the EPRI Distribution Center, (510) 934–4212:Google Scholar
  2. 1a.
    Report of the 1992 Fusion Panel, TR-101649, November 1992. (Expert panel's key criteria for comparing alternative fusion technologies.)Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Utility Requirements for Fusion, AP-2254, February 1982. (Broad-based industry derivation of fusion power plant characteristics judged most important to electric utilities.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Kaslow
  • M. Brown
  • R. Hirsch
    • 1
  • R. izzo
  • J. McCann
    • 2
  • D. McCloud
    • 3
  • B. Muston
  • A. PetersonJr.
  • S. Rosen
  • T. Schneider
    • 4
  • P. Skrgic
  • B. Snow
  1. 1.Washington OfficeEPRIUSA
  2. 2.Maintenance ManagerConsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.New YorkUSA
  3. 3.Nuclear Research Projects DepartmentTennessee Valley AuthorityUSA
  4. 4.EPRIPalo Alto

Personalised recommendations