Skip to main content
Log in

The upper age limit for egg donation recipients

  • News and Views
  • Controversies in Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Antinori S, Versaci C, Hossein Gholami G, Caffa B, Panci C: A child is a joy at any age. Hum Reprod 1993;10:1542

    Google Scholar 

  2. David G, Czyglik F, Mayaux MJ, Martin-Boyce A, Schwartz D: Artificial insemination with frozen sperm: Protocol, method of analysis and results for 1188 women. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:1022–1028

    Google Scholar 

  3. AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit, Fertility Society of Australia: Assisted Conception, Australia and New Zealand. Sydney, University of Sydney, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fivnat 1989 et Bilan General: 1986–1989. Contrib Fertil Sexual 1990;18:588–600

  5. Fitzgerald CT, Seif MW, Killick SR, Bennett DA: Age related changes in the female reproductive tract. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:229–233

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abdalla HI, Baber R, Kirkland A, Leonard T, Power M, Studd JWW: A report on 100 cycles of oocyte donation; factors affecting the outcome. Hum Reprod 1990;8:1018–1022

    Google Scholar 

  7. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams M, Garrisi GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, Grunfeld L: Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age-related decline in female fertility. Lancet 1991;337:1375–1377

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sauer MV, Miles RA, Dahmoush L, Paulson RJ, Press M, Moyer D: Evaluating the effect of age on endometrial responsiveness to hormone replacement therapy: A histologic ultrasonographic, and tissue receptor analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meldrum DR, Marr B, Stubbs C, Wisot A, Yeo L, Hamilton F: Impaired uterine receptivity in infertile women over 40 having oocyte donation and correction with progesterone replacement. Reprod Fertil Dev 1992;4:689–693

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA: Pregnancy after age 50: Application of oocyte donation to women after natural menopause. Lancet 1993;341:321–323

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flamigni C: Egg donation to women over 40 years of age. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1343–1344

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benagiano G: Pregnancy after the menopause: A challenge to Nature? Hum Reprod 1993;8:1344–1345

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wood EC: Oocyte donation—recent trends and concerns. Med J Aust 1994;160:282–284

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowman MC, Saunders DM: Oocyte donation to older women: When and how do we draw the line? Med J Aust 1994;160:244–245

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV: Oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age: “How old is too old?” Hum Reprod 1994;9:571–572

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seibel MM, Zilberstein M, Seibel S: Becoming parents after 100? Lancet 1994;343:603

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edwards RG: Pregnancies are acceptable in postmenopausal women. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1542–1543

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts CL, Algert CS, March LM: Delayed childbearingAre there any risks? Med J Aust 1994;160:539–544

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pregnancy outcome in post-menopausal women aged >50 after oocyte donation. Abstracts of the 10th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE, Brussels, 1994, No. 63, p 31

  20. Bowman MC, Saunders DM: Community attitudes to maternal age and pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology: Too old at 50 years? Hum Reprod 1994;9:167–171

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saunders, D., Bowman, M. The upper age limit for egg donation recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet 12, 230–232 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212921

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212921

Navigation