Skip to main content
Log in

Three ethically justified indications for selective termination in multifetal pregnancy: A practical and comprehensive management strategy

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors provide an ethical justification for three indications for performing selective termination of multifetal pregnancies. These indications are (1) achieving a pregnancy that results in a live birth of one or more infants with minimal neonatal morbidity and mortality, (2) achieving a pregnancy that results in a live birth of one or more infants without antenatally detected anomalies, and (3) achieving a pregnancy that results in a singleton live birth. This ethical justification is based on two basic approaches to obstetric ethics that emphasize that these indications must be established on the basis of informed consent. The authors underscore the importance of matters of private conscience and demonstrate the consistency of the ethical justification with existing public policy in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wapner RJ, Davis GH, Johnson A,et al: Selective termination of multifetal pregnancies. Lancet 1991;335:90–93

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Wapner R: Selective termination to a singleton is ethically justified. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zaner RM, Boehm FH, Hill GA: Selective termination in multiple pregnancies: Ethical considerations. Fertil Steril 1990;54:203–205

    Google Scholar 

  4. Overall C: Selective termination of pregnancy and women's reproductive autonomy. Hast Cen Report 1990;20:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective fetal termination. ACOG Committee Opinion 94, April 1991

  6. Evans MI, Drugan A, Bottoms SF,et al: Attitudes on the ethics of abortion, sex selection, and selective pregnancy termination among health care professionals, ethicists, and clergy likely to encounter such situation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:1092–1099

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hobbins JC: Selective reduction—a perinatal necessity? N Engl J Med 1988;318:1062–1063

    Google Scholar 

  8. Annas G: Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. N Engl J Med 1984;316:1213–1214

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson LJ, Milliken N: Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. JAMA 1988;259:1060–1066

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCullough LB, Chervenak FA: Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. Diamond E: Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1988;319:950

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engelhardt, Jr. HT: The Foundations of Bioethics. New York, Oxford University Press, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  13. Evans MI, Fletcher JC, Zador IE,et al: Selective first-trimester termination in octuplet and quadruplet pregnancies: clinical and ethical issues. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans MI, Dommergues M, Timor-Tritsch I,et al: Transabdominal versus transcervical and transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction: international collaborative experience of more than one thousand cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:902–909

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113,93 S.Ct. 705,35 L. ed. 2d 147

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chervenak, F.A., McCullough, L.B. & Wapner, R. Three ethically justified indications for selective termination in multifetal pregnancy: A practical and comprehensive management strategy. J Assist Reprod Genet 12, 531–536 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212916

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212916

Key words

Navigation