Skip to main content
Log in

Cumulative birth rates following cryopreservation of all embryos in stimulatedin vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To cryopreserve all good-quality embryos available after IVF is one way to avoid an impending hyperstimulation and a more attractive alternative to a couple than cancellation of the cycle. At Sahlgrenska University Hospital this method has been practiced since 1991. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate (defined as childbirth per couple) after IVF treatment including one stimulated cycle, resulting in cryopreservation of all good-quality embryos available, followed by replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in one or more natural cycles.

Design

A cohort of 32 women undergoing one stimulation for IVF between January 1991 and December 1993 where all good-quality embryos were cryopreserved and transferred in a later spontaneous cycle were studied retrospectively. The cumulative childbirth rate per couple was calculated.

Results

A total of 28 women underwent a total of 45 transfers with frozen-thawed embryos. In 4 women no transfer has taken place so far. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 33% (15/45) and per patient 54% (15/28). Three spontaneous abortions occurred giving a cumulative childbirth rate per patient of 39% (11/ 28). In addition, 6 out of the 28 women still have embryos left in the freezer.

Conclusion

Cryopreservation of all good-quality embryos available after IVF is a highly effective alternative to cancellation of a cycle when there is impending hyperstimulation. The use of this approach results in a cumulative childbirth rate per coupleof at least 39%. Since only one stimulation was performed, it also seems to be cost effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N: Ovarian hyperStimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril 1992;58:249–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wikland M, Nilsson L, Hansson R, Hamberger L, Jansson PO: Collection of human oocytes by the use of sonography. Fertil Steril 1983;39:603–608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palermo G, Joris H, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A: Sperm characteristics and outcome of assisted fertilization by subzonal insemination and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1993;59:826–835

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP: Human embryo features that influence the success of preservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril 1985;44:645–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson-Sykes S, Dunphy BC, Pattinson HA, Jarrell J, Zhang XQ: Factors predicting outcome in 215 consecutive thawed embryo replacements. Fertil Steril 1994;61:1156–1157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pattinson HA, Hignett M, Dunphy BC, Fleethan JA: Outcome of thaw embryo transfer after cryopreservation of all embryos in risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 1994;62:1192–1196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amso NN, Ahuja KK, Morris N, Shaw RW: The management of predicted ovarian hyperstimulation involving gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog with elective cryopreservation of all pre-embryos. Fertil Steril 1990;53:1087–1090

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dale PO, Tanbo T, Åbyholm T: In-vitro fertilization in infertile women with the polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod 1991;6:238–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Puissant F, v Rysselberge M, Barlow P, Deweze J, Leroy F: Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 1987;2:705–708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schenker JG, Weinstein D: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a current study. Fertil Steril 1978;30:255–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rizk B, Aboulghar M. Modern management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod 1991;6:1082–1087

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wada I, Matson PL, Troup SA, Morroll DR, Hunt L, Lieberman BA. Does elective cryopreservation of all embryos from women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome reduce the incidence of the condition? Br J Obstet Gynecol 1993;100:265–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergh, C., Werner, C., Nilsson, L. et al. Cumulative birth rates following cryopreservation of all embryos in stimulatedin vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 12, 191–194 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211797

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211797

Key words

Navigation