Abstract
Popper's idea of propensities constituting the physical background of predictable probabilities is reviewed and developed by introducing a suitable formalism compatible with standard probability calculus and with its frequency interpretation. Quantum statistical ensembles described as pure cases (“eigenstates”) are shown to be necessarily not homogeneous if propensities are actually at work in nature. An extension of the theory to EPR experiments with local propensities leads to a new and more general proof of Bell's theorem. No joint probabilities for incompatible observables need to be introduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. R. Popper,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics (Hutchinson, London, 1988).
F. Selleri,Philosophia Naturalis 28, 17 (1991).
J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1965).
K. R. Popper, “Bell's theorem: A note on locality,” in A. van der Merweet al., eds.,Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, Vol. 1 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988).
J. Tersoff and D. Bayer,Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 553 (1983).
K. R. Popper,A World of Propensities (Thoemmes, Bristol, 1990).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
See, e.g., A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982); W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790 (1985).
J. von Neumann,The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).
J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne,Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).
E. P. Wigner,Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970).
See F. Selleri,Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990), Chap. 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filho, J.B.B., Selleri, F. Propensity, probability, and quantum physics. Found Phys 25, 701–716 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059124
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059124