Popper's idea of propensities constituting the physical background of predictable probabilities is reviewed and developed by introducing a suitable formalism compatible with standard probability calculus and with its frequency interpretation. Quantum statistical ensembles described as pure cases (“eigenstates”) are shown to be necessarily not homogeneous if propensities are actually at work in nature. An extension of the theory to EPR experiments with local propensities leads to a new and more general proof of Bell's theorem. No joint probabilities for incompatible observables need to be introduced.
KeywordsJoint Probability Statistical Ensemble Suitable Formalism Standard Probability General Proof
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.K. R. Popper,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics (Hutchinson, London, 1988).Google Scholar
- 2.F. Selleri,Philosophia Naturalis 28, 17 (1991).Google Scholar
- 3.J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1965).Google Scholar
- 4.K. R. Popper, “Bell's theorem: A note on locality,” in A. van der Merweet al., eds.,Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, Vol. 1 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988).Google Scholar
- 5.J. Tersoff and D. Bayer,Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 553 (1983).Google Scholar
- 6.K. R. Popper,A World of Propensities (Thoemmes, Bristol, 1990).Google Scholar
- 7.A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).Google Scholar
- 8.See, e.g., A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982); W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790 (1985).Google Scholar
- 9.J. von Neumann,The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).Google Scholar
- 10.J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne,Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).Google Scholar
- 11.E. P. Wigner,Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970).Google Scholar
- 12.See F. Selleri,Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990), Chap. 6.Google Scholar