Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 363–377 | Cite as

Statevector reduction in discrete time: A random walk in Hilbert space

  • Akihiro Nakano
  • Philip Pearle
Article

Abstract

A simple model is presented in which the statevector evolves every ε seconds in one of two ways, according to a particular probability rule. It is shown that this random walk in Hilbert space results in reduction of the statevector. It is also shown how the continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) theory of statevector reduction is achieved as a limiting case of this model, exactly as Brownian motion is a limiting case of ordinary random walk. Finally, a slightly different but completely equivalent form of the CSL equations suggested by the simple model given here is discussed.

Keywords

Hilbert Space Simple Model Brownian Motion Random Walk Discrete Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. S. Bell, inSchrodinger-Centenary Celebration of a Polymath, C. W. Kilmister, ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987); inSpeakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987), pp. 167–212.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. S. Bell, inThemes inContemporary Physics II, Essays in Honor of Julian Schwinger's 70th Birthday, S. Deser and R. J. Finkelstein, eds. (World-Scientific, Singapore 1989), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. S. Bell, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. S. Bell,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987), pp. 117–138.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Bohm and J. Bub,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 453 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Pearle,Phys. Rev. D 13, 857 (1976);Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 489 (1979);Found. Phys. 12, 249 (1982);Phys. Rev. D 29, 235 (1984); inThe Wave-Particle Dualism, S. Dineret al., eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984), pp. 457–483;J. Stat. Phys. 41, 719 (1985); inQuantum Concepts in Space and Time, R. Penrose and C. J. Isham, eds. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986);Phys. Rev. D 33, 2240 (1986); inNew Techniques in Quantum Measurement Theory, D. M. Greenberger, ed. (New York Academy of Science, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Gisin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1657 (1984).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber,Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986),Phys. Rev. D 36, 3287–3289 (1987);Found. Phys. 18, 1, (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Pearle,Phys. Rev. A 39, 2277 (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, and A. Rimini,Phys. Rev. A 42, 78 (1990).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Gisin,Helv. Phys. Acta 62, 363 (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Diosi,Phys. Lett. A 132, 233 (1988).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. P. Belavkin,Phys. Lett. A 140, 355 (1989).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Pearle and J. Soucek,Found. Phys. Lett. 2, 287 (1989).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    For reviews, see G. C. Ghirardi and A. Rimini, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York 1990), pp. 167–191; G. C. Ghirardi and P. Pearle, to be published inProceedings of the Philosophy of Science Foundation 1990, Volume 2, A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, eds. (PSA Association, Michigan 1992).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    For attempts to make a relativistic CSL theory, see P. Pearle, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York 1990), pp. 193–214; G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and P. Pearle,Found. Phys. 20, 1271 (1990); inProceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World-Scientific, Singapore 1991); P. Pearle, inQuantum Chaos—Quantum Measurement, P. Cvitanovicet. al., eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992), pp. 283–297.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. Nicrosini and A. Rimini,Found. Phys. 20, 1317 (1990).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Pearle, inElectromagnetism: Paths to Research, Doris Teplitz, ed. (Plenum, New York 1982), pp. 211–295.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Feller,An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications (Wiley, New York 1950).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Note added in proof. Eqs. (8.5), (8.6) turn out to be most suitable when generalizing to non-white noise: see P. Pearle,Phys. Rev. A 48, 913 (1993).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akihiro Nakano
    • 1
  • Philip Pearle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsHamilton CollegeClinton

Personalised recommendations