Skip to main content
Log in

Local reality: Can it exist in the EPR-Bohmgedanken experiment?

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring processes of a single spin-1/2 object and of a pair of spin-1/2 objects in the EPR-Bohm state are modeled by systems of differential equations. The latter model is a local model with hidden variables of the EPR-Bohm gedanken experiment. Although there is no dynamical interaction between the pair of spin-1/2 objects, the model reproduces approximately the quantum-mechanical correlations by coincidence counting. Hence the Bell inequality is violated. This result supports the idea that the coincidence counting is the source of the apparent nonlocality in the EPR-Bohm gedanken experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Bell,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966). S. Kochen and E. P. Specker,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. G. Beltrametti and G. Cassinelli,The Logic of Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1981), Chap. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser,Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972); E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson,Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 465 (1976); M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Miitig,Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976); A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981),Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982),Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982); W. Perrie, A. J. Duncan, H. J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen,Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1790 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne,Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. W. Marshall, E. Santos, and F. Selleri,Phys. Lett. A 98, 5 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. C. Scalera,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 38, 16 (1983),Lett. Nuovo Cimento 40, 353 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Notarrigo,Nuovo Cimento B 83, 173 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Pascazio,Phys. Lett. A 118, 47 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Pascazio, inQuantum Mechanics versus Local Realism, F. Selleri, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1988), p. 391.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ferrero, T. W. Marshall, and E. Santos,Am. J. Phys. 58, 683 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Santos,Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1388 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Santos,Found. Phys. 21, 221 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. J. Squires,Phys, Lett. A 178, 22 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, New York, 1951), Chap. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roughly speaking, an attractor is an invariant set on which neighboring trajectories accumulate. In our case, a, and a, are just limit cycles. See J.-P. Eckmann and D. Ruelle,Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 617 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Redhead,Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987) Sec. 4.1., p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Watanabe,Knowing and Guessing—A Quantative Study of Inference and Information (Wiley, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uchiyama, S. Local reality: Can it exist in the EPR-Bohmgedanken experiment?. Found Phys 25, 1561–1575 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055508

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055508

Keywords

Navigation