Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 39, Issue 11, pp 1308–1314 | Cite as

Colonoscopic perforations

Etiology, diagnosis, and management
  • Lawrence J. DamoreII
  • Peter C. Rantis
  • Anthony M. VernavaIII
  • Walter E. Longo
Current Status


Since its introduction into clinical medicine, flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy has had a great impact on diagnosis and management of diseases of the colon and rectum. There are three mechanisms responsible for colonoscopic perforation: specifically, mechanical perforation directly from the colonoscope or a biopsy forceps, barotrauma from overzealous air insufflation, and, finally, perforations that occur during therapeutic procedures. Perforation of the colon, which requires surgical intervention more frequently than bleeding, occurs in less than 1 percent of patients undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy and may be seen in up to 3 percent of patients undergoing therapeutic procedures such as polyp removal, dilation of strictures, or laser ablative procedures. Management of colonic perforation secondary to colonoscopy remains a controversial issue in that it can be effectively managed by operative and nonoperative measures. If a perforation does occur, signs and symptoms that the patient will experience will be related to both the size and site of the perforation, adequacy of the bowel preparation, amount of peritoneal soilage, underlying colonic pathology (where a thin walled colon from colitis or ischemia, for example, may result in a larger perforation than a healthy colon), and, finally, overall clinical condition of the patient. Radiology often establishes diagnosis. Plain films of the abdomen and an upright chest x-ray may reveal extravasated air confined to the bowel wall, free intraperitoneal air, retroperitoneal air, subcutaneous emphysema, or even a pneumothorax. A localized perforation may demonstrate lack of pneumoperitoneum. Some surgeons recommend surgery for all colonoscopic perforations; however, there does appear to be a role for conservative management in a select group of patients such as those with silent asymptomatic perforations and those with localized peritonitis without signs of sepsis that continue to improve clinically with conservative management. Finally, conservative management works well in those patients with postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome. Surgery is most definitely indicated in the presence of a large perforation demonstrated either colonoscopically or radiographically and in the setting of generalized peritonitis or ongoing sepsis. The presence of concomitant pathology at time of colonoscopic perforation such as a large sessile polyp likely to be a carcinoma, unremitting colitis, or perforation proximal to a nearly obstructing distal colonic lesion may force immediate surgery. Finally, in the patient who deteriorates with conservative management, one should proceed to surgery.

Key words

Colonoscopy Perforation Management Review 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wolff WI, Shinya H. Colonofiberoscopy. JAMA 1971;217:1509–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macrae FA, Tan KG, Williams CB. Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopies. Gut 1983;24:376–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heath B, Rogers A, Taylor A, Lavergne J. Splenic rupture: an unusual complication of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:449–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lo AY, Beaton HL. Selective management of colonoscopic perforations. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:333–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghazi A, Grossman M. Complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy. Surg Clin North Am 1982;62:889–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shinya H. Complications: prevention and management. In: Colonoscopy, diagnosis and treatment of colonic diseases. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin, 1982:199–208.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waye JD. Colonoscopy: a clinical view. Mt Sinai J Med 1975;42:1–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams C, Teague R. Colonoscopy. Gut 1973;14:990–1003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burt CA. Pneumatic rupture of the intestinal canal with experimental data showing the mechanism of perforation and the pressure required. Arch Surg 1931;22:875–902.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kozarek RA, Earnest DL, Silverstein ME, Smith RG. Airpressure induced colon injury during diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1980;78:7–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reeve T, Kukora JS. Pneumatic perforation of the colon during colonoscopy: is the hypermobile right colon a risk factor? Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:751–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Picciano LD, Hansel BC, Luchette FA. Insufflation: complications and recommendations. Surg Endosc 1995;9:834–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams CB, Lane RH, Sakai Y. Colonoscopy: an air-pressure hazard. Lancet 1973;2:729.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tedesco FJ. Colonoscopic polypectomy. In: Silvis SE, ed. Therapeutic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. New York: Igaku-Shoin, 1985:269–288.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience of 1576 polyps. Am Surg 1988;54:61–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bigard MA, Gaucher P, Lassalle C. Fatal colonic explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 1979;77:1307–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomson SR, Fraser M, Stupp C, Baker LW. Iatrogenic and accidental colon injuries—what to do? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:496–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall C, Dorricott NJ, Donovan IA, Neoptolomos JP. Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgicalversus conservative management. Br J Surg 1991;78:542–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O'Brien TS, Garrido MC, Dorudi S, Collin J. Delayed perforation of the colon following colonoscopic biopsy. Br J Surg 1993;80:1204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rankin GB. Indications, contraindications, and complications of colonoscopy. In: Sivak MV, ed. Gastroenterologic endoscopy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1987: 868–80.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lezak MB, Goldhammer M. Retroperitoneal emphysema after colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 1974;66:118–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fitzgerald SD, Denk A, Flynn M, Longo WE, Vernava AM. Pneumoperitoneum and subcutaneous emphysema of the neck: an unusual manifestation of colonoscopic perforation. Surg Endosc 1992;6:141–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barnett T, McGeehin W, Chen C, Brennan EJ. Acute tension pneumoperitoneum following colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:99–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Winek TG, Mosely S, Grout G, Luallin D. Pneumoperitoneum and its association with ruptured abdominal viscus. Arch Surg 1988;123:709–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwab G, Wetscher G, Waldenberger P, Bodner E. Retropneumoperitoneum: an unusual case after colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1993;25:256–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meyers MA, Ghahremani GL. Complications of fiberoptic endoscopy. Radiology 1975;115:301–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCollister DL, Hammerman HJ. Air, air, everywhere: pneumatosis cystoceles coli after colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36:75–6.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thomas JH, Pierce GE, MacArthur RI. Bilateral pneumothoraces secondary to colonic endoscopy. J Natl Med Assoc 1979;71:701–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stapokis JC, Thickman D. Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs. upright chest film. Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:713–6.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vincent M, Smith LE. Management of perforation due to colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:61–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soon JC, Shang NS, Goh PM, Rauff A. Perforation of the large bowel during colonoscopy in Singapore. Am Surg 1990;56:285–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Christie JP, Marrazzo J. “Mini-perforation” of the colon—not all post-polypectomy perforations require laparotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:132–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Adair HM, Hishon S. The management of colonoscopic and sigmoidoscopic perforation of the large bowel. Br J Surg 1981;68:415–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carpio G, Albu E, Gumbs MA, Gerst PH. Management of colonic perforation after colonoscopy: report of three cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:624–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J, Henkel Th, Kraus M, Manegold BC. Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract: therapy and prognosis. Surg Endosc 1994;8:672–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rogers BH, Silvis SE, Nebel DT, Sugawa C, Mandelstram P. Complications of flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy and polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1975;22:73–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Smith LE. Fiberoptic colonoscopy: complications of colonoscopy and polypectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1976;19:407–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stone HH, Fabian TC. Management of perforating colon trauma. Ann Surg 1979;190:430.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence J. DamoreII
    • 1
  • Peter C. Rantis
    • 1
  • Anthony M. VernavaIII
    • 1
  • Walter E. Longo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySaint Louis University Health Sciences CenterSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations