Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative examination of various rectal tubes and contrast media for the reduction of intussusceptions

  • Originals
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hydrodynamic influence of different rectal tube sizes, contrast media, and heights of the fluid column on hydrostatic reduction of intussusception was analyzed in vitro. Enemas were performed in dead rabbits to compare the filling speed of bowel with a liquid and a gaseous contrast medium. For hydrostatic reduction, tubing and rectal tube with a large caliber and a low viscosity contrast medium achieved a higher filling speed of colon and are expected to provide a higher force of reduction on the intussusceptum. A rectal tube with a large caliber can be more useful than an increase of the column height. Filling bowel with carbon dioxide was approximately 7 times faster than with meglumine sodium diatrizoate. Theoretical considerations allow the hypothesis that a gaseous medium provides a faster and steadier reduction than a liquid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell JB (1989) Contrast media in intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 19: 293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bissett GS, Kirks DR (1988) Intussusception in infants and children: diagnosis an therapy. Radiology 186: 141

    Google Scholar 

  3. Franken EA (1988) Nonsurgical treatment of intussusception. AJR 150: 1353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu L, Alton DJ, Daneman A, Stringer DA, Liu P, Wilmot DM, Reilly BJ (1988) Intussusception reduction in children by rectal insufflation of air. AJR 150: 1345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Phelan E, DeCampo JF, Malecky G (1988) Comparison of oxygen and barium reduction of ileocolic intussusception. AJR 150: 1349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paes RA, Hyde I, Griffith DM (1988) The management of intussusception. Br J Radiol 61: 187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gierup J, Jornulf H, Liraditis A (1972) Management of intussusception in infants and children: a survey based on 288 consecutive cases. Pediatrics 50: 535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuta AJ, Benator RM (1990) Intussusception: hydrostatic pressure equivalents for barium and meglumine sodium diatrizoate. Radiology 175: 125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitz-Rode, T., Müller-Leisse, C. & Alzen, G. Comparative examination of various rectal tubes and contrast media for the reduction of intussusceptions. Pediatr Radiol 21, 341–345 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011482

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011482

Keywords

Navigation