Skip to main content
Log in

Realism, positivism, instrumentalism, and quantum geometry

  • Part III. Invited Papers Dedicated To Sir Karl Popper
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The roles of classical realism, logical positivism, and pragmatic instrumentalism in the shaping of fundamental ideas in quantum physics are examined in the light of some recent historical and sociological studies of the factors that influenced their development. It is shown that those studies indicate that the conventionalistic form of instrumentalism that has dominated all the major post-World War II developments in quantum physics is not an outgrowth of the Copenhagen school, and that despite the “schism” in twentieth century physics created by the Bohr-Einstein “disagreements” on foundational issues in quantum theory, both their philosophical stands were very much opposed to those of conventionalistic instrumentalism. Quotations from the writings of Dirac, Heisenberg, Popper, Russell, and other influential thinkers, are provided, illustrating the fact that, despite the various divergencies in their opinions, they all either opposed the instrumentalist concept of “truth” in general, or its conventionalistic version in post-World War II quantum physics in particular. The basic epistemic ideas of a quantum geometry approach to quantum physics are reviewed and discussed from the point of view of a quantum realism that seeks to reconcile Bohr's “positivism” with Einstein's “realism” by emphasizing the existence of an underlying quantum reality, in which they both believed. This quantum geometry framework seeks to introduce geometro-stochastic concepts that are specifically designed for the systematic description of that underlying quantum reality, by developing the conceptual and mathematical tools that are most appropriate for such a use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Popper,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics (Hutchinson, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Russell,A History of Western Philosophy (Simon and Shuster, New York, 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Popper,Conjectures and Refutations (Harper & Row, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Popper, inQuantum Theory and Reality, M. Bunge, ed. (Springer, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Popper,Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Cini,Fundamenta Scientiae 1, 157 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Pickering, inPions to Quarks: Particle Physics in the 1950's, L. M. Brown, M. Dresden, and L. Hoddeson, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. S. Schweber, inPions to Quarks: Particle Physics in the 1950's, L. M. Brown, M. Dresden, and L. Hoddeson, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. T. Cushing,Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. A. M. Dirac,Phys. Rev. 139B, 684 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. A. M. Dirac, inDirections in Physics, H. Hora and J. R. Shepanski, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. A. M. Dirac, inMathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, A. R. Marlow, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. A. M. Dirac, inReminiscences About a Great Physicist: Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac, B. N. Kursunoglu and E. P. Wigner, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. d'Espagnat,Reality and the Physicist (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Prugovečki,Quantum Geometry: A Framework for Quantum General Relativity (Kluwer, Dordrecht, in press).

  16. E. Prugovečki,Found. Phys. 21, 93 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Prugovečki,Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Spacetime, corr. printing (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Nelson,Quantum Fluctuations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kh. Namsrai,Nonlocal Quantum Field Theory and Stochastic Quantum Mechanics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Heisenberg,Phys. Today 29(3), 32 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Gell-Mann, inThe Nature of the Physical Universe: 1976 Nobel Conference, D. Huff and O. Prewett, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Volumes 1–4 (Springer, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Pais,Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. 49, 769 (1916); translated in English by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery as “The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity,” pp. 109–164 inThe Principle of Relativity (Methuen, London, 1923; reprinted by Dover, New York, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Stachel, inEinstein and the History of General Relativity and Gravitation, D. Howard and J. Stachel, eds. (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Jammer,The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. J. Folse,The Philosophy of Niels Bohr (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Murdoch,Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics, edition with corrections (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. Selleri,Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. P. Stapp,Found. Phys. 21, 1 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Petersen, inNiels Bohr: A Centenary Volume, A. P. French and P. J. Kennedy, eds. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  32. N. Bohr,Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Science Editions, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Kline,Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty (Oxford University Press, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. Bohr,The Unity of Knowledge (Doubleday, New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  35. N. Bohr,Essays 1958/1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. P. Stapp,Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Schwinger, ed.,Quantum Electrodynamics (Dover, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. S. Kragh,Dirac: A Scientific Biography (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. A. M. Dirac,Nature 137, 298 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Pais, inReminiscences About a Great Physicist: Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac, B. N. Kursunoglu and E. P. Wigner, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  41. P. A. M. Dirac,Commun. Dublin Inst. Adv. Studies A 3, 1 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  42. P. A. M. Dirac,Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 209, 251 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  43. N. N. Bogolubov, A. A. Logunov, and I. T. Todorov,Introduction to Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory (Benjamin, Reading, Mass., 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  44. C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber,Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  45. F. J. Dyson,Phys. Rev. 85, 631 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. Glimm and A. Jaffe,Quantum Physics, 2nd edition (Springer, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. Franklin,The Neglect of Experiment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. Franklin,Experiment, Right or Wrong (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  49. W. Heisenberg,Physics and Beyond (Harper and Row, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  50. F. J. Dyson,Math. Intelligencer 5(3), 47 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  51. H. Poincaré, inReadings on the Philosophy of Science, Feigl, H., and M. Brodbeck, eds. (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  52. W. V. Quine, inReadings in Philosophical Analysis, H. Feigle and W. Sellars, eds. (Apple-Century-Crofts, New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  53. S. S. Schweber,Osiris 2, 265 (1986).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. P. Lorenzen,Constructive Philosophy (University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass., 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  55. E. Prugovečki,Found. Phys. Lett. 3, 37 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  56. E. Prugovečki,Found. Phys. Lett. 4, 129 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  57. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  58. E. P. Wigner,Z. Phys. 131, 101 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  59. H. Araki and M. M. Yanase,Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  60. E. P. Wigner, inQuantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  61. P. Busch,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18, 3351 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  62. A. Einstein, inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Harper & Row, New York, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  63. C. Swoyer, inMeasurement, Realism and Objectivity, J. Forge, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  64. G. F. R. Ellis, inEinstein and the History of General Relativity, D. Howard and J. Stachel, eds. (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  65. J. Stachel, inGeneral Relativity and Gravitation, Vol. 1, A. Held, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  66. G. F. Chew and H. P. Stapp,Found. Phys. 18, 809 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  67. V. Kaplunowski and M. Weinstein,Phys. Rev. D 31, 1879 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  68. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  69. M. Born,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 463 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  70. J. A. Brooke and E. Prugovečki,Nuovo Cimento A 79, 237 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  71. E. Prugovečki,Nuovo Cimento A 102, 881 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  72. H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, and W. Zimmermann,Nuovo Cimento 6, 319 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  73. J. Fröhlich, G. Marchio, and F. Strocchi,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)119, 241 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  74. A. van der Merwe, F. Selleri, and G. Tarozzi, eds.,Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  75. G. Tarozzi and A. van der Merwe, eds.,The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  76. M. Kafatos, ed.,Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  77. A. Bohmet al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. 3, 1103 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  78. W. Drechsler and E. Prugovečki,Found. Phys. 21, 513 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  79. M. Jammer,Concepts of Space (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  80. B. S. DeWitt and N. Graham,The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  81. J. D. Barrow and F. J. Tipler,The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  82. J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking,Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  83. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  84. E. P. Wigner, inThe Scientist Speculates, I. G. Good, ed. (Heineman, London, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  85. M. Bunge,Causality (World Publishing, Cleveland, Ohio, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  86. J. S. Bell,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cabridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  87. J. C. Polkingbore, inA Passion for Physics: Essays in Honor of Geoffrey Chew, C. De Tar, J. Finkelstein, and C. I. Tan, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  88. R. L. Oldershaw,Am. J. Phys. 56, 1075 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prugovečki, E. Realism, positivism, instrumentalism, and quantum geometry. Found Phys 22, 143–186 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893610

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893610

Keywords

Navigation