Abstract
On the occasion of the centennial of his birth, Schrödinger's life and views are sketched and his critique of the interpretation of quantum mechanics accepted at his time is examined. His own interpretation, which he had to abandon after a short time, provides a prime example of the way in which the tentative meaning of central theoretical terms in a new and revolutionary theory often fails. Schrödinger's strong philosophical convictions have played a key role in his refusal to break with many of the notions of classical physics. At the same time, they made him into a keen and incisive critic of the Copenhagen interpretation. His criticism is compared with present views on quantum mechanics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Schrödinger,Nature and the Greeks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1954).
From Schrödinger's speech at the occasion of his inauguration to membership in the Prussian Academy of Science, 1929, as quoted by M. Jammer,The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), p. 255.
E. Schrödinger,Nuovo Cimento 9, 162–170 (1958).
E. Schrödinger,My View of the World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1964).
L. Boltzmann,Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974), pp. 33 and 65.
B. Bertotti, “The later work of E. Schrödinger,”Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 16, 83–100 (1985).
L. A. Wessels,Schrödinger's Interpretation of Wave Mechanics, Ph.D. Dissertation, Indiana University, 1975.
E. Schrödinger,Naturwissenschaften 17, 486–489 (1929).
E. Schrödinger, “Are there quantum jumps?”Br. J. Philos. Sci. 3, Part I: 109–123, Part II: 233–242 (1952).
E. Schrödinger, “Energieaustausch nach der Wellenmechanik,”Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 83, 956–968 (1927).
E. Schrödinger,Was ist ein Naturgesetz? (R. Oldenburg, Muenchen, 1962), p. 102 (my translation).
K. Przibram,Briefe zur Wellenmechanik (Springer-Verlag, Wien, 1963).
V. V. Raman and P. Forman, “Why was it Schrödinger who developed de Broglie's ideas?”,Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 1, 291–314 (1969).
L. Wessels, “Schrödinger's route to wave mechanics,”Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 10, 311–340 (1979).
E. Schrödinger,Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics (Chelsea, New York, 1982); contains a translation of his four original papers as well as later papers and four lectures.
M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).
M. Born, “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgaenge,”Z. Phys. 37, 863–867 (1926). It is to be noted that this first of several publications about the probabilistic interpretation by Born contains the crucial point (that ψψ* rather than |ψ| is to be interpreted as a probability) only as a footnote.
W. Heisenberg, “Ueber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,”Z. Phys. 43, 172–198 (1927).
E. Schrödinger, “Neue Wege in der Physik,”Elektrotech. Z. 50, 15–16 (1929).
E. Schrödinger, “Ueber das Verhaeltnis der Heisenberg-Born-Jordanschen Quantenmechanik zu der meinen,”Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 79, 734–756 (1926).
Quoted by A. Pais,Inward Bound (Clarendeon Press, Oxford, 1986), p. 255.
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).
E. Schrödinger, “Discussion of probability relations between separated systems,”Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31, 555–563 (1935).
E. Schrödinger, “Probability relations between separated systems,”Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 32, 446–452 (1936).
E. Schrödinger, “Die gegenwaertige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,”Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–812, 823–828, 844–849 (1935). A translation can be found in J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek,Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983).
A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982); A. Aspect, J. Delibart, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
F. Rohrlich, “Schrödinger's criticism of quantum mechanics—fifty years later,” pp. 555–572, in P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds.,Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, Fifty Years of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Gedankenexperiment (World Scientific, Singapore, 1985).
N. D. Mermin, “The EPR experiment—thoughts about the loophole,” pp. 422–427, in D. M. Greenberger,New Techniques and Ideas in the Quantum Measurement Theory (New York Academy of Science, New York, 1987);Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 480, 422–427 (1986).
A. Shimony, “Metaphysical Problems in the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics,”Int. Philos. Quarterly 18, 2–17 (1978).
A. Shimony, “Reflections on the Philosophy of Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger,” pp. 305–317, in R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky,A Portrait of Twenty Five Years, Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1960–1985 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985).
F. Rohrlich, “Reality and Quantum Mechanics,” pp. 373–381 in Ref. 28. in
W. Heisenberg,Philosophy and Physics (Harper, New York, 1958), especially p. 185.
M. L. G. Redhead, “Relativity and quantum mechanics—conflict or peaceful coexistence?” pp. 14–20 in Ref. 28. in
E. Schrödinger,Statistical Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1948).
E. Schrödinger,Space-time Structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1963).
E. Schrödinger,What is Life? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rohrlich, F. Schrödinger and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Found Phys 17, 1205–1220 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889594
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889594