Skip to main content
Log in

On the impossible pilot wave

  • Part I. Invited Papers Dedicated to Louis De Broglie
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strange story of the von Neumann impossibility proof is recalled, and the even stranger story of later impossibility proofs, and how the impossible was done by de Broglie and Bohm. Morals are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. A. Schilp, Ed.,Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist (Tudor, New York, 1949), p. 666.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. Schilp, Ed.,Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist (Tudor, New York, 1949), p. 672.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. von Neumann,Mathematisch Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1932); English translation: Princeton University Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Born,Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance (Clarendon, Oxford, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 165, 180 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. de Broglie, inRapport au V'ieme Congres de Physique Solvay (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Jauch and C. Piron,Helvetica Physica Acta 36, 827 (1963);Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 228 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Jauch, private communication (1963).

  9. J. S. Bell, SLAC-PUB-44, Aug. 1964;Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).

  10. B. Misra,Nuovo Cimento 47, 843 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kochen and E. P. Specker,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. P. Gudder,Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 229 (1968);J. Math. Phys. 9, 1411 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Jost, inSome Strangeness in the Proportion (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1980), p. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Woolf, ed.,Some Strangeness in the Proportion (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Pauli, in A. George, ed.,Louis de Broglie, physicien et penseur (Albin Michel, Paris, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. Rosenfeld, in A. George, ed.,Louis de Broglie, physicien et penseur (Albin Michel, Paris, 1953), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Heisenberg, in W. Pauli, ed.,Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics (Pergamon, London, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. de Broglie,Found. Phys. 1, 5 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Bohm,Wholeness and the Implicate Order (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Born, ed.,The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London, 1971), p. 192, and letters 81, 84, 86, 88, 97, 99, 103, 106, 108, 110, 115, and 116.

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. P. Wigner, inSome Strangeness in the Proportion (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1980), p. 463.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. S. Bell, inProc. Symposium on Frontier Problems in High Energy Physics, in honor of Gilberto Bernardini on his 70th birthday (Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Mugur-Schächter,Étude du charactère complet de la théorie quantique (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. J. Belinfante,A Survey of Hidden Variable-Theories (Pergamon, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. Phillipidas, C. Dewdney, and B. J. Hiley,Nuov. Cim. 52B, 15 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Dewdney and B. J. Hiley,Found. Phys. 12, 27 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. M. Gleason,J. Math. Mech. 6, 885 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Fine and P. Teller,Found. Phys. 8, 629 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. S. Bell,Inter. J. of Quantum Chem., Quantum Chemistry Symposium No. 14 (Wiley, New York, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. J. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. W. Sciama, eds.,Quantum Gravity 2 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1980), p. 611.

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. Forman, “Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory 1918–1927,” in R. McCormmach, ed.,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3 (Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1971), pp. 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  33. T. J. Pinch, “What Does a Proof Do if it Does Not Prove?, A Study of the Social Conditions and Metaphysical Divisions Leading to David Bohm and John von Neumann Failing to Communicate in Quantum Physics,” in E. Mendelsohn, P. Weingart, and R. Whitly, eds.,The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977), pp. 171–215.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Clauser and A. Shimony,Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1881 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. F. M. Pipkin,Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics 14 (Academic Press, New York, 1979), p. 281.

    Google Scholar 

  36. F. Selleri and G. Tarozzi,Riv. Nuov. Cim. 4 (2) (1981).

  37. B. d'Espagnat,A la Recherche du Reel (Gauthier Villars, Paris, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, J.S. On the impossible pilot wave. Found Phys 12, 989–999 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889272

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889272

Keywords

Navigation