Skip to main content
Log in

The wave-particle dualism in 1992: A summary

  • Part III. Invited Papers Dedicated To Louis De Broglie
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We review the past and present theoretical and experimental situations relating to wave-particle dualism. New tests aimed at enlightening the individual behavior as awave, then as aparticle, of asingle quantum mechanical system in the same experimental run are presented. The related epistemological, philosophical, and historical backgrounds are presented in a twofold exposition taking into account thepositivistic standard Copenhagen interpretation as well as therealist de Broglian point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Bohr,Nature (London)121, 580–590 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Hauschildt,Proceedings, 1989 Gdansk Conference (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990), pp. 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Selleri,Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality, A. van der Merwe, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Selleri,The Wave-Particle Duality (Plenum, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Einstein,Oeuvres choisies, Vol. 1, Quanta: mécanique statistique et physique quantique, F. Balibar, O. Darrigol, and B. Jech, eds. (Seuil/CNRS, Paris, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 132 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. de Broglie, “Recherches sur la théorie des quanta” (doctoral thesis, 1924).Ann. Phys. (Paris) (10)III, 22–128 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. O. Scully and H. Walther,Phys. Rev. A 39 (1989); see p. 5231.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. O. Scully and H. Walther,Nature (London)351 (1991); see p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Holton,The Scientific Imagination (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978); see p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Lochack, “Que savons-nous du dualism des ondes et des particules à la fin du XX° siècle?,”La pensée physique contemporaine (Augustin Fresnel, Moulidars, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Einstein,Comment je vois le monde (Flammarion, 1958), pp. 197–198; German title:Meine Weltbild.

  13. O. Darrigol,La recherche 220, 446–452 (1990); see pp. 448 and 450.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reference 6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 549–560 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 17, 891–921 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Diner, D. Farge, G. Lochack, and F. Selleri,The Wave-Particle Dualism (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Einstein,Phys. Z. 10, 185 (1909).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Einstein,Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Deligeorge, “La catastrophe ultraviolette,”Le monde quantique (Seuil, Paris), pp. 21–22.

  21. N. Bohr,K. Dan Vidensk, Selsk 8, Raekke IV, 1.

  22. F. Selleri, “Gespensterfolder,” Ref. 18, pp. 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. de Broglie,Nouvelles perspectives en micrphysique (Albin Michel, Paris, 1956), p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. de Broglie,Une tentative d'interprétation causale et non-linéaire de la mécanique ondulatoire (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Bohr, H. A. Kramers, and J. C. Slater,Philos. Mag. 47, 172–198 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Bothe and H. Geiger,Z. Phys. 32, 639 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Compton and A. W. Simon, (a)Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 306 (1925);

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Compton and A. W. Simon, (b)Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 289 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  29. W. Heisenberg,Z. Phys. 43, 172–198 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Schrödinger, (a)Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 81, 109–139 (1926);

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. Schrödinger, (b)Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 79, 734–756 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Born,Z. Phys. 437, 863–867 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. Jordan,Z. Phys. 40, 809 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  35. O. Costa de Beauregard,Revue de métaphysique et de morale 4, 553 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166–193 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  37. B. d'Espagnat,A la recherche du réel (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  38. B. d'Espagnat,Une incertaine réalité (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 89, 1010 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. Bohm and J. P. Vigier,Phys. Rev. 96, 208–216 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. de Broglie,La mécanique quantique restera-t-elle indéterministe? (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. P. Vigier,Found. Phys. 21, 125–147 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  43. L. Jánossy and Zs. Narav,Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 9, 588 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. F. Clauser,Phys. Rev. D 9, 853 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  45. P. Grangier, G. Roger, and A. Aspect,Europhysics Lett. 1, 17 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  46. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  49. T. Kuhn,La structure des revolutions scientifiques (Flammarion, Paris, 1983, translation of 1st English edn., 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  50. G. Badurek, H. Rauch, and D. Tupinger,Phys. Rev. A 34, 2600 (1986); see p. 2601.

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Schmidt and F. Selleri,Found. Phys. Lett. 21, 1–17 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1990), pp. 15–24.

  53. W. Bagh,Z. Phys. 169, 492 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Boorsch and B. Lichte,Z. Phys. B 237, 449 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  55. W. K. Wooters and W. H. Zurek,Phys. Rev. D 19, 473 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  56. H. Rauch and J. P. Vigier,Phys. Lett. A 151, 269–275 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  57. J. Baggott, “Beating the uncertainty principle,”New Scientist, 15 February 1992, pp. 36–40.

  58. P. Ghose, D. Home, and G. S. Agarwal,Phys. Lett. A 153, 403–407 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  59. P. Ghose and S. N. Roy,Phys. Lett. A 161, 5–8 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  60. A. Petersen,Bull. At. Scientists 19, 8–14 (1963); see p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. T. Cushing, “Causal quantum theory: Why a nonstarter?” in Ref. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  62. K. R. Popper,The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson, London, 1959); 1st edn., 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  63. K. R. Popper,Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  64. P. Galison,How Experiments End (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1987); see p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Combourieu, MC., Rauch, H. The wave-particle dualism in 1992: A summary. Found Phys 22, 1403–1434 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883732

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883732

Keywords

Navigation