Skip to main content
Log in

Parameter dependence and outcome dependence in dynamical models for state vector reduction

  • Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated To Asim Orhan Barut
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We apply the distinction between parameter independence and outcome independence to the linear and nonlinear models of a recent nonrelativistic theory of continuous state vector reduction. We show that in the nonlinear model there is a set of realizations of the stochastic process that drives the state vector reduction for which parameter independence is violated for parallel spin components in the EPR-Bohm setup. Such a set has an appreciable probability of occurrence (≈ 1/2). On the other hand, the linear model exhibits only extremely small parameter dependence effects. We investigate some specific features of the models and we recall that, as has been pointed out recently, if one wants to be able to speak of definite outcomes (or equivalently of possessed objective elements of reality) at finite times, one has to slightly change the criteria for their attribution to physical systems. The concluding section is devoted to a detailed discussion of the difficulties which one meets when one tries to take, as a starting point for the formulation of a relativistic theory, a nonrelativistic scheme which exhibits parameter dependence. Here we derive a theorem which identifies the precise sense in which the occurrence of parameter dependence forbids a genuinely relativistic generalization. Finally we show how the appreciable parameter dependence of the nonlinear model gives rise to problems with relativity, while the extremely weak parameter dependence of the linear model does not give rise to any difficulty, provided one takes into account the appropriate criteria for the attribution of definite outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. S. Bell, inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Suppes and M. Zanotti, inLogic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, P. Suppes, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976); B. van Fraassen,Synthese 52, 25 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Jarrett,Noûs 18, 569 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Shimony, inProceedings of the International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, S. Kamefuchiet al., eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. Bell, A. Shymony, M. A. Horne, and J. F. Clauser,Dialectica 39, 85 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Eberhard,Nuovo Cimento 46B, 392 (1978); G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 27, 293 (1980); G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber,Europhysics Lett. 6, 95 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber,Phys. Rev. D34, 470 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. S. Bell inSchrödinger-Centenary Celebration of a Polymath, C.E.W. Kilmister, ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Pearle,Phys. Rev. A39, 2277 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, and A. Rimini,Phys. Rev. A42, 78 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. C. Ghirardi and A. Rimini, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physics Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Physics, A. I. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Benatti, G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber,Nuovo Cimento 100B, 27 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and P. Pearle,Found. Phys. 20, 1271 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and P. Pearle, inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. S. Bell, inSpeakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. S. Bell,Themes in Contemporary Physics II: Essays in Honor of Julian Schwinger's 70th Birthday, S. Deser and R. J. Finkelstein, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Pearle, inSixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physics Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Physics, A.I. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Bloch,Phys. Rev. 156, 1377 (1967); K. E. Hellwig and K. Kraus,Phys. Rev. D 1, 566 (1970); Y. Aharonov and D. Z. Albert,Phys. Rev. D 21, 3316 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work supported in part by the Trieste Section of the INFN.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghirardi, G.C., Grassi, R., Butterfield, J. et al. Parameter dependence and outcome dependence in dynamical models for state vector reduction. Found Phys 23, 341–364 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883717

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883717

Keywords

Navigation